Portland welcomes Google Fiber, but will Google accept?

The Portland city council last week voted to approve Google Fiber, Google's high-speed Internet service it plans to roll out in 34 cities across the nation. 

Dion Lefler/The Wichita Eagle/AP
Chanute Mayor Greg Woodyard stands on a brick mosaic of the Google Earth logo at the intersection of Lincoln and Main streets, in Chanute, Kan., May 21, 2014. Encircling and crisscrossing this town of 9,100 people is more than 30 miles of some of the fastest Internet fiber cable in the nation. The system has already brought state-of-the-art broadband speeds to government buildings, the town library, the community college, the hospital, and some local businesses. Every park and green space and most of the outdoor areas downtown are covered by free Wi-Fi.

Google Fiber may soon be coming to Portland, Ore.  

As part of Google's plan to bring high-speed Internet to 34 cities across the United States, the Portland city council last week voted to approve Google's service to the city after a preliminary deal had been reached in April.  

Should Google decide to proceed with building the network, the city estimates the network will cost the company at least $300 million to build. Google will provide an update by the end of the year on which cities will be receiving Fiber, according to Google Fiber spokeswoman Jenna Wandres. 

If Google does follow through on this agreement, however, it will pay a 5 percent "franchise fee" on its video revenues, according to The Oregonian. Conversely, Google will not pay the 3 percent public, educational, and government access tax (or "PEG fee") the city charges to broadband providers such as Comcast. While Google will not be required to serve all parts of the city, it will provide free Internet to individual users after a one-time $300 fee and free Internet to various nonprofits around the city. 

Additionally, Portland and Oregon "will participate in a 'joint defense' of the franchise if it faces a legal challenge over allegations it gave Google Fiber preferential treatment, exceeded the city's authority, or violates the law in some way," according to The Oregonian. 

Moreover, Google still has to reach agreements with the city on the 200 utility cabinets it wants to install – which have already faced obstacles in Kansas City, a previous Google Fiber hub – in addition to licensing agreements with Portland utility pole owners. 

Fiber reportedly runs 100 times faster than basic broadband connections, which use often copper cables as opposed to fiber-optic ones. Kansas City was the first city to receive Google Fiber. Since then, Fiber has also been moving into Provo, Utah and Austin, Texas. 

But Google's foray into fiber hasn't come without its share of hiccups along the way. For example, in Kansas City, although Google selected that city for Fiber in March 2011, homes did not begin high-speed connections until November of the following year. 

"It's a very physical process," said former Kansas City mayor Joe Reardon to the San Jose Mercury News in February. "In order for it to be delivered to us, it means that fiber has to be laid on the ground in the city on rights-of-way or on poles, and you have to get it into the neighborhoods and into the house. It takes time." 

"It does take time," added Google Fiber spokeswoman Jenna Wandres. "It's probably one of the biggest infrastructure projects these cities have ever seen."

Google's efforts are also indicative of the desire among many people for faster Internet speeds. In the United States, only 7 percent of broadband subscribers use fiber connections, as opposed to as many as 30 percent in Sweden and as many as 60 percent in countries like South Korea and Japan. 

[Editor's note: The original version of this story misstated the progress of Portland's Google Fiber plan. The city's government has approved a roll out of fiber optic connections throughout the city, but Google has not yet agreed to such a plan.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.