Facebook will make its Messenger app mandatory for mobile chat

Want to talk with Facebook friends on your mobile device? Soon, you'll need to have Messenger installed on your machine. 

Hope you got Messenger on there, buddy.

Way back in 2011, Facebook introduced Messenger, effectively giving mobile users two chat options: Talk with friends on Messenger, or talk with friends via the core Facebook app. 

Today, Facebook announced that it would begin nudging users away from the latter option, and toward Messenger. "We have built a fast and reliable messaging experience through Messenger and now it makes sense for us to focus all our energy and resources on that experience," the company says in a statement provided to Reuters. 

Facebook did not provide a precise time frame, but eventually the social networking company will make Messenger mandatory for mobile chatting. At that point, the chat option will be entirely pulled from the core app. 

So is this the right move? Well, over at Mashable, Lance Ulanoff takes a pretty strong stand. The whole thing, is a "terrible" idea, he writes, not only because the Messenger app is "sub-par," but because he believes it's going to be a pain switching back and forth between two apps. 

"Don’t take this the wrong way, Facebook, but your home-grown app business is shaping up to be a huge fail. Haven’t you noticed how when you buy, it flies (Instagram) and when you build it fails (Home)?" Mr. Ulanoff writes, referencing the Android app Home, Facebook's mostly ignored phone software. "Messenger is, at least, familiar inside Facebook, but it really needs the whole environment around it to truly fly. Don’t clip its wings." 

For the most part, Messenger has received positive marks since its launch three years ago. 

"I personally like compartmentalizing certain aspects of social networking," Jill Duffy recently wrote in a review for PCMag, "so I like the idea of having instant messages and Facebook text messages in their own area, cordoned off from the more 'casual' and less immediate activities that I partake in on the network." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.