New RAZRs: Motorola introduces its first phones under Google

The Motorola RAZR HD, RAZR MAXX HD, and RAZR M should hit shelves in coming weeks. 

Motorola
The Motorola RAZR MAXX HD.

Just when you thought you were safe from phones with consonant-heavy, all-upper-case names, Motorola has gone ahead and released a trio of new RAZRs.

The flagship model of the bunch is the RAZR HD, which sports a super-thin (.33 inches) chassis and a 4.7-inch display with 720 x 1280 resolution – 50 percent more pixels per inch than the Apple iPhone 4S, according to Motorola. 

Meanwhile, the RAZR MAXX HD (yep, that's all uppercase to you, buddy) is essentially the RAZR HD with an expanded battery. And the RAZR M (perhaps M is for "micro") is a smaller version of the HD, with a 4.3-inch display and a "really, really small" footprint, to quote the folks over at Information Week. All three RAZRs will ship with 1.5-GHz, dual-core processors, and all three handsets will get the Android Ice Cream Sandwich OS. 

Motorola's choice of software mightily disappointed Alex Colon of PC Mag. "Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) has already been out for nearly three months now," Colon argues. "But what's more is that Google owns Motorola! Surely new phones from Motorola should ship with the latest version of the OS. Motorola promised an update before the end of the year, but it would be a big reason to switch to Motorola if you were promised you'd get the latest software first." 

The RAZR MAXX HD is pictured at left. It's a good looking phone – sleek and slim, with a nifty Kevlar finish. Expect the RAZR HD, RAZR MAXX HD, and RAZR M to hit shelves in coming weeks – just as Apple releases its iPhone 5

To receive regular updates on how technology intersects daily life, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.