Nokia loses $1.7 billion, but Lumia phones kept it from being much worse

Nokia's Lumia phones did well last quarter, but the company still lost $1.7 billion. Can the company fight back against the encroaching iPhone and Android?

Tsering Topgyal/AP/File
In this file photo from June, an Indian shopkeeper selling Nokia mobile phones awaits customers in New Delhi, India. Nokia's net loss more than tripled in the second quarter.

Nokia posted a second-quarter loss of as much as $17.4 billion, with year over year net sales loss of 26 percent, according to an earnings announcement the company released today.

This marks a fifth straight quarter of losses for Nokia. After 14 years as the leading mobile-phone manufacturer, a position it lost earlier this year, its value has dropped 64 percent this year to its lowest value since 1994.

Since Apple’s introduction of the iPhone in 2007, Nokia has lost $117 billion of value. It now has a market cap of 6 billion Euros.

CEO Stephen Elop hopes the companies line of powerful Lumia smart phone will stem that loss. Nokia has shipped 4 million Lumias phones, which runs on the Microsoft Windows Phone OS.

Under Elop, the company ditched its struggling mobile platform, Symbian, and put its chips on the relatively well received Microsoft mobile operating system. However, because the current Lumias cannot be upgraded to the upcoming Windows Phone 8 OS, there is some fear that those numbers will not be sustained. Elop, though, believes the upcoming phone OS is an opportunity.

“We plan to provide updates to current Lumia products over time,” he said in a statement. “well beyond the launch of Windows Phone 8. We believe the Windows Phone 8 launch will be an important catalyst for Lumia.”

In addition to the Lumia, other bright spots in an otherwise dark picture include North American sales, which are up 45 percent, and the company’s cash position, of about $5.17 billion, is better than analysts anticipated.

Apple’s iPhone and Google’s Android system are challenging both Nokia and RIM, the makers of the Blackberry, eating away at their once dominant positions in the mobile ecosystem.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.