'Great women like you': Twitter bot battles sexism with kindness

Online harassment of New Zealand’s female political candidates has increased ahead of the country’s Oct. 17 general election. But a new Twitter bot is countering sexism online by detecting abusive posts and tweeting words of encouragement in response.

Edgar Su/Reuters
New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern hugs a student during a visit to Cashmere High School in Christchurch, New Zealand, March 20, 2019. A Plan International study showed 1 in 5 girls had cut down on social media use after experiencing online harassment.

An abuse-fighting bot has sent out hundreds of positive messages on social media to counter the online harassment of women candidates in New Zealand’s general election.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, her main rival the opposition leader Judith Collins, and more than 260 female parliamentary candidates have become a target for online hatred and sexism ahead of the Oct. 17 national polls.

That prompted the launch in August of the Parity Bot, which was first used in Canada’s elections last year and tweets a positive message every time it detects an abusive tweet against a female candidate.

“A whole bunch of studies out there show women candidates get exponentially more toxic tweets than men, which is why we have created this for women,” said Jacqueline Comer, creative technologist of the bot.

“It is not to say that men don’t suffer from this, but it is a bigger problem for women,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by phone.

Since launching in New Zealand, the first nation to give women the right to vote in 1893, the bot has analyzed 95,000 tweets and detected more than 1,800 abusive tweets, most of them targeting Ms. Ardern and Ms. Collins.

After the bot, developed by the Canada-headquartered Areto Labs, detects such tweets it puts out pre-written positive messages such as “great women like you running to make NZ a better place.”

The abusive tweets jumped from about 20 a day to a high of 100 during election campaigns against women candidates, said Ms. Comer.

A study this week by Plan International, a girls’ rights group, showed one in five girls and young women had cut down or quit using social media after experiencing online harassment.

“We haven’t treated online spaces as spaces where we live and work,” said Golriz Ghahraman, an Iranian-born lawmaker who came to New Zealand as a child refugee and has been called a “terrorist” and “jihadist” online.

The Green Party lawmaker, who is seeking re-election in the upcoming polls, called for “some form of legal regulation” on the online attacks against women.

“For women, the failure to regulate online spaces has led to very serious breach of our rights to equality and access to equal opportunity,” said Ms. Ghahraman.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.