With Obama-era internet privacy rules in GOP crosshairs, VPNs get another look

Virtual private networks (VPNs) give users the ability to browse the internet privately, without allowing internet service providers to access their browsing history.

Andrew Harnik/AP/File
The Federal Communications Commission building in Washington, June 19, 2015. Republicans in the House have followed the Senate in overturning an Obama-era broadband privacy regulation that set tough restrictions on what companies like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T could do with customers’ personal information.

On Tuesday, the Republican-led House voted 215-205 to repeal rules adopted last year by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under the Obama administration that required internet service providers to obtain consumer consent before using their data for advertising or marketing purposes. Many critics voiced criticism of the repeal, which had already passed the Senate last week, due to privacy concerns.

For many who want to keep their web surfing private, the repeal has generated renewed interest in virtual private networks, or VPNs, as a way to hide their browsing history and personal information from prying corporate eyes.

"Time to start using a VPN at home," Vijaya Gadde‏, general counsel of Twitter, wrote in a tweet on Tuesday. Twitter later clarified Ms. Gadde was commenting in a personal and not official capacity. 

VPNs make an encrypted connection to a private server which can then search the internet on the customer's behalf without revealing address destinations to broadband providers. These networks are often used to connect to a secure business network and are also used in countries with internet censorship such as China and Turkey in order to access restricted sites.

Supporters of the recent repeal said that the FCC unfairly required service providers to do more to protect consumer privacy than websites like Google or Facebook. But critics worry that by eliminating internet privacy rules, providers could easily gain access to significant pieces of information about consumers, including financial information and health data. As The Christian Science Monitor's Jack Detsch reported in February:

Some privacy advocates worry that the stay of the rules could move the US further away from developing a robust regime of digital privacy rights for consumers. In contrast, the European Union's data protection reforms put into effect last year articulate individual rights to accessing, transferring and a "right to be forgotten" – ensuring that companies such as Google and Facebook can't retain data without the consumer's permission. 

"The US does not have a comprehensive data privacy law or regime that protects consumers across the internet ecosystem," said Natasha Duarte, a fellow at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based technology policy think tank. "That would be the ideal that we would have one robust comprehensible standard that consumers would be able to control what happens to their data, whether it’s [internet service providers] or Google."....

What's more, there appears to be little movement on an Obama-era push for a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights that would have given Americans greater ability to see and control which companies collected their data, an effort that seemed to slow in the latter part of the last administration.

The repeal of the privacy regulations has critics worried that anyone who wants to keep their browsing history away from their broadband providers would have to use a VPN, which could be a complicated or expensive solution for some web-surfers.

"The further along toward being a computer scientist you have to be to use a VPN, the smaller a portion of the population we're talking about that can use it," said Ernesto Falcon, a legislative counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which opposed the bill, according to Reuters.

Another potential problem is VPNs funnel all user traffic through a single point, which can make them a tempting target for hackers looking to collect valuable user data en masse.

There are some options available that are free and more user-friendly, however. Last year, for example, the browser Opera began running a free, built-in VPN service in response to the increasing demand for private browsing. Smaller service providers such as Sonic, a California-based company, have also begun to offer free VPNs as a selling point, allowing customers to connect to the internet away from home while keeping their information private.

"We see VPN as being important for our customers when they're not on our network. They can take it with them on the road," Sonic chief executive officer Dane Jasper told Reuters.

This article contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.