Uber to cease controversial use of Greyball: Will that be enough to repair its image?

In a statement yesterday the ride-sharing company said that it will prohibit its drivers from using the Greyball app to evade regulators.

Tyrone Siu/Reuters/File
A taxi is reflected in a window at the office of ride-hailing service Uber in Hong Kong, Aug. 12, 2015.

After weeks of bad press, Uber is trying to both fix its relationship with regulators and improve its public image in order to make its ride-hailing company more palatable to consumers. 

On Wednesday, Uber announced it had obtained the proper permits to test its self-driving cars in California. Last year, the company had publicly refused to apply for the $150 state permit, escalating an ongoing feud with regulators.

Also on Wednesday, Uber said it would be prohibiting the use of its “Greyball” tool to evade or dupe regulators, a tactic that was first brought to light last week by The New York Times.

Uber is "expressly prohibiting its use to target action by local regulators going forward," Uber's chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, said in a company blog post on Wednesday, adding that "it will take some time to ensure this prohibition is fully enforced."

Uber’s Greyball was initially developed to show faux cars, or no cars at all, on a fake version of the app to those who had violated the terms of service by threatening or harassing drivers. But soon, the tool became used for shadier purposes, As Ben Rosen previously reported for The Christian Science Monitor:

The Greyball program, which an Uber spokeswoman said is still in use today, uses customers’ geo-location data, credit-card information, and app-usage and social media habits to identify those working for city governments or driving for rival ride-hailing services, including taxi companies, according to the Times report.

The program was reportedly first developed to protect Uber drivers in cities where they faced threats of violence. Uber employees told the Times the practices and tools were developed, in part, as safety measures to protect drivers in some countries. In France, India and Kenya, for instance, taxi companies and workers targeted and attacked new Uber drivers.

But Uber soon realized it could expand Greyball, part of a program called “Violation of terms of service” (VTOS), to sidestep government officials and others in cities where it faced restrictions or was banned. According to the Times, when Uber moved into a new city, it appointed a general manager to oversee the expansion. This person, using a sort-of Greyball playbook, would try to spot and trick enforcement officers and other city officials.

The revelation of greyballing against regulators came at a particularly bad time for the company. In recent weeks, stories about a recent high-profile sexual harassment scandal, the release of a video showing Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick arguing with a driver who was complaining about cuts to the rates paid to drivers, and protests from critics of President Trump after Mr. Kalanick was appointed to the administration’s economic advisory council all dominated social and conventional media.

There was also a #deleteUber campaign on Twitter in response to accusations the company tried to take advantage of a pro-immigrant taxi strike in New York City in January.

Uber’s brushes with regulators in the past have sometimes served it well. Uber has skirted around many of the regulatory bonds that are associated with traditional taxi services, allowing the company to quickly expand in a few short years. Currently, Uber is valued at around $60 billion by investors. 

This article contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Uber to cease controversial use of Greyball: Will that be enough to repair its image?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today