Tim Cook pushes back on Apple Watch sales estimate

An IDC report claims Apple Watch sales were down 71 percent in the 3rd quarter. But is that really the whole story?

Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
The new Apple Watch models are displayed inside an Apple Inc. store in Los Angeles, Sept. 16.

Despite a damning analysis by the International Data Corporation (IDC), Tim Cook says the Apple Watch is “doing great.”

On Monday, an IDC report claimed Apple Watch sales were down 71 percent in the third quarter, while fitness trackers lead the wearables market. Apple’s chief executive conveyed a different narrative to Reuters, however, writing that the company’s smartwatch sales growth was actually “off the charts,” but declining to share actual sales figures.

“In fact, during the first week of holiday shopping, our sell-through of Apple Watch was greater than any week in the product’s history,” Cook wrote. “And as we expected, we’re on track for the best quarter ever for Apple Watch.”

In the original report, IDC analysts identified an “aging lineup and an unintuitive user interface” as the cause of Apple’s apparent sales decline.

“As user tastes change, so will their needs,” Ramon Llamas, research manager for IDC's wearables team, said in a statement. “That's the opportunity for smart wearables with multi-functionality and third-party applications, both for consumers and business users. To get there, we need to see more intuitive user interfaces, seamless user experiences, standalone connectivity, and applications that go beyond health and fitness and into personal and professional productivity.”

But that analysis may hinge upon uncertain data. Apple doesn’t share its sales data, notes ComputerWorld tech columnist Jonny Evans, so IDC’s estimates may or may not be entirely accurate. It’s also unclear whether the research firm included sales estimates from non-tech department stores, where the Apple Watch is commonly sold.

Even if IDC’s sales estimates are correct, the overall narrative may not be. The report combines high-end smartwatches and low-end fitness trackers in the same “wearables” sales category, which may skew overall market trends. Meanwhile, the third quarter was also a “bridging period” between the announcement of the Apple Watch Series 2 and the device’s actual release in September – in other words, consumers may have stopped buying the previous Apple Watch while waiting for the new model.

In a post for ComputerWorld, Mr. Evans wrote:

The headline should be “Apple Watch sales slow while customers wait for a new version,” not “Apple Watch sales fall 71 percent.”

The first is what happened, the second is also what happened but divorces the events from the time in which they took place, and what they represent.

In this way, reports of plummeting sales represent a trickier type of fake news story. The IDC report and Cook’s statement are competing realities, both presented as fact even though neither can be easily debunked. And until some actual figures are released, it will likely stay that way.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.