Why South Korea refuses to share mapping data with Google

Security concerns outweigh the benefits of Google Maps, a South Korean court determined Friday. The government had asked Google to blur sensitive information about military facilities, which the tech giant declined to do.

Hong KI-won/Yonhap/AP
Choe Byong-Nam, a director general of South Korea's National Geographic Information Institute, speaks after a meeting at the National Geographic Information Institute in Suwon, South Korea, Friday.

In a disappointment for the multinational tech firm, South Korea will not share mapping data with Google.

Making its much-anticipated ruling on Friday, a South Korean court determined that the security risks of providing the data to Google outweighed the convenience of the company's Maps service. The country had been divided over the issue since Google filed its request to use locations data back in June.

Having Google Maps would have made it easier for tourists to find their way around, possibly making it more likely that foreigners would visit the country, proponents had argued. At the same time, the South Korean government was concerned that Google Maps would also allow other countries – specifically North Korea – to access sensitive information about military facilities.

As a foreign company, Google would need to have a domestic data server to be able to use local mapping data, according to South Korean law. Google currently handles its maps data at centers outside the country.

The ruling means the app can’t offer walking or driving directions in South Korea and that’s an issue for tourists and business travelers, say some government ministries. Though South Korea has fast, cheap internet access, online navigation is only available through local companies – in Korean.

And with the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang coming up, not having Google Maps would be particularly problematic for the influx of tourists expected to visit the city, Google suggested.

One answer, some local businesses said, was for Google, an Alphabet company, to build data centers in South Korea. Current Google policy is to distribute all data across multiple computers in different locations, and often different countries.

The government, meanwhile, said its primary concern was the security of military facilities. Foreign governments might be able to look at images provided through Google and target South Korean military installations, it suggested.

But if Google blurred sensitive information related to those facilities, then the government would bend the rule prohibiting foreign companies with international data centers from using mapping data.

Google, however, declined to do this, leading to a court case.

"Our position from the start was that if it deletes security facilities, we would allow exporting [the local mapping data],” said Kim Tong-il, an official at the land ministry. "Google's position is that it won't delete those. The question was whether we would allow that regardless."

In a statement after the ruling, Taj Meadows, a Google spokesperson, said the company was "disappointed" by the decision, saying the company has "always taken security concerns very seriously."

Google will continue to provide the same Maps service as it did before, in compliance with South Korean legislation.

Material from the Associated Press contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why South Korea refuses to share mapping data with Google
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today