Why are distracted driver fatalities on the rise again?

Traffic fatalities in 2015 saw the biggest increase in the past few decades, and safety experts blame distracted driving as the leading factor.

Steven Senne/AP
Police officer Matthew Monteiro speaks to a motorist about texting while driving while patrolling on his bicycle on July 20, 2016, in East Bridgewater, Mass. Efforts to discourage drivers from texting have increased in recent years, but the consensus is that the problem is only getting worse. Police departments around the country have gotten creative in trying to get drivers to put down their phones.

Hands-free apps and devices were initially seen as the solution to reducing distracted-driving related traffic fatalities. As drivers became increasingly reliant on their smartphones to navigate, be entertained, and stay connected while on the road, manufacturers and software developers perceived the risks as a matter of dexterity – or lack thereof. 

But despite keeping drivers' hands on the steering wheel, the technology has not been accompanied by a decline in the number of fatalities. In fact, crashes have risen at the fastest pace in nearly 50 years, with the biggest increase posed by distraction-related accidents. The sobering numbers reflect a need to examine new strategies to address distracted driving as people become increasingly inseparable from their smartphones.

“It’s the cognitive workload on your brain that’s the problem,” Deborah Hersman, the president of the nonprofit National Safety Council and former chairwoman of the federal National Transportation Safety Board, told The New York Times, pointing out that the various technologies may have “encouraged people to use even more functions on their phones while driving.”

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 35,092 people died in crashes on US roadways in 2015. Fatalities caused by distraction rose by 8.8 percent, representing the biggest change.

Young drivers, in particular, are especially prone to this type of crash, as evident from recent cases of collision involving teenage drivers crashing while using Snapchat. According to NHTSA, drivers aged between 15 to 19 years old represent the largest proportion of drivers distracted at the time of crashes.

There are some technologies in place to block calls or texts when a person is driving, as well as gears that can orient screens to a more suitable place on the car dashboard where a driver’s eyes won’t have to drift too far from the road. General Motors in 2014 also experimented with a system that can detect distracted drivers.

But one of the most attractive solutions floated so far is the introduction of autonomous cars, an experiment currently carried out by companies such as Tesla, Uber, and Google. The US Department of Transportation has pledged annual grants to further develop the technology.

"The clear theme is human error and inattention," Chris Urmson, the former head of Google's self-driving program, wrote in a blog post in 2015. "Our self-driving cars can pay attention to hundreds of objects at once, 360 degrees in all directions, and they never get tired, irritable or distracted."

Self-driving cars are programmed to avoid collisions and follow traffic rules, thus erasing factors of driver distraction or fatigue from causing accidents. Implementing the new technology, however, still holds challenges.

Several crashes with autonomous vehicles have occurred when they collided with distracted drivers, indicating that unless all the cars on the road are autonomous, human errors will still be a factor causing traffic fatalities.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.