How is Yahoo doing after the data breach?

Usage of Yahoo's email service appears stable, even after more than 500 million users saw their passwords, phone numbers, and other information accessed in a data breach.

Dado Ruvic/Reuters
Yahoo Mail's logo is displayed on a smartphone's screen in front of a code in this illustration taken on October 6, 2016.

Yahoo reported an increase in profits for the third quarter of this year, with earnings of $162.8 million, or 17 cents per share – a timely bit of reassuring news for a company that saw its credibility suffer greatly after a massive data breach.

“Frankly, I look at the numbers, they’re not that bad relative to what they could have been,” JMP Securities analyst Ron Josey told The Wall Street Journal. “It should be somewhat more comforting to see that things aren’t falling off a cliff.”

Perhaps more surprisingly, the number of emails sent and read by users also rose, as well as the number of page views on the email service – this, after the company acknowledged in September that more than 500 million users’ accounts were hacked back in late 2014, a belated announcement that brought on fierce criticism of its security capabilities. And earlier this month, Reuters reported that Yahoo had secretly scanned hundreds of millions of users’ emails for evidence of terrorist activity at the behest of law-enforcement authorities, raising fresh doubts about the privacy of users’ communications.

But many Yahoo email users are apparently persisting, in what could be a reflection of what many researchers say is a common reluctance to change longstanding habits when it comes to certain cyber-security practices.

In one 2015 conference paper analyzing why cyber-security awareness campaigns often failed to change behavior, experts from Oxford and the University of London wrote that influencing users’ behavior effectively would require more than simply providing them with information. Users "need, first of all, to accept that the information is relevant, secondly, understand how they ought to respond, and thirdly, be willing to do this in the face of many other demands," they wrote. 

The latest earnings report isn’t all rosy news for Yahoo, by any means. The company has benefitted from a cost-cutting program that saw one-fifth of its workforce, or some 2,200 workers, laid off over the past year, according to the Associated Press. But after subtracting advertising commissions for July through September, its revenue fell 14 percent, to $857 million – the fourth consecutive quarterly plunge of 10 percent or more. Projections by the company’s management see it extending into the final three months of the year.

The chief danger facing the company is the fate of a $4.83 billion buyout from Verizon, which has recently hinted at having cold feet. The buyout was announced in July, just a few months before the Yahoo data breach was made public.

Last week, Verizon general counsel Craig Silliman told Reuters that a clause in the deal could allow it to withdraw before the SEC and European Commission performed their review of the merger, if the data breach were found to have had a “material adverse effect” on the business.

"I think we have a reasonable basis to believe right now that the impact is material and we're looking to Yahoo to demonstrate to us the full impact," said Mr. Silliman. "If they believe that it's not then they'll need to show us that."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How is Yahoo doing after the data breach?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today