Fingerprint recognition could soon replace keys, credit cards

After Apple helped popularize the use of fingerprint identification by incorporating sensors in its phones last year, the prospects for a new frontier in the world of smart cards have brightened.

Jason Lee/Reuters/File
A journalist tested the the new iPhone 5S Touch ID fingerprint recognition feature at Apple Inc event in Beijing, in September 2013.

The burgeoning arena of fingerprint technology is poised for an assault on another area of personal identification: smart cards.

At the vanguard of groups betting on the future direction of fingerprint identification is Sweden's Fingerprint Cards (FPC), which is predicting that 2018 will be the year when biometric smart cards, using fingerprint identification, become its fastest growing market. The widespread application could be used for anything from shopping, to commuter passes, to building entry, and keyless cars, reports Reuters.

While FPC has become the market leader in this increasingly crowded sector, with its share price surging by 1,600 percent last year, some of its competitors are less sanguine about the prospects of smarts cards using fingerprint identification.

The meteoric rise of FPC's share price, which has now caused the company’s market value to exceed $4 billion, owes much to Apple's popularizing of fingerprint sensors by incorporating them in its phones, even though it sources the hardware from an in-house supplier.

Advocates of the technology say fingerprint identification is both simpler and more secure than other techniques used to confirm identity, such as pin codes. And it is not just the firms manufacturing the products that feel this way: Fingerprint identification is already finding its way into myriad facets of everyday life.

Take Alaska Airlines, for example, which ran a pilot scheme last year to introduce the biometrics technology as a "curb-to-seat experience."

"Our big-picture dream is that any time you have to prove who you are during any of the steps of air travel, you could simply use your fingerprint instead," Jerry Tolzman, manager of Alaska Airlines customer research and development, said. "Using biometrics as identification has a huge potential to simplify the travel experience and eliminate hassles, while adding to the security of air travel."

Looking specifically at smart cards, there is hesitancy among some of the leading manufacturers of fingerprint sensors in terms of how soon the technology will be adopted.

Sascha Behlendorf, a product manager at Germany's Giesecke & Devrient, one of the three leading manufacturers of smart cards, told Reuters that she expected widespread uptake in a time-frame of five to 10 years.

A Silicon Valley firm, Synaptics, which is FPC's closest rival in terms of smartphone sensors, expressed similar caution.

"It's hard for me to project market share in a segment of the market [when] we're not sure when it's going to happen," said Anthony Gioeli, marketing vice president in the Synaptics biometrics division.

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.