How using a gun emoji can get you arrested

While the use of emojis has been popularly embraced as a nuanced form of expression, new legal issues have followed the use of particular emojis that are deemed threatening.

|
Mary Altaffer/AP/File
Julie Zhuo, product design director at Facebook, demonstrates the new emoji-like stickers customers will be able to press in addition to the like button

Last November, when Oxford Dictionaries announced that its Word of the Year for 2015 was the "Face With Tears of Joy" emoji, not everybody was happy. In fact, the announcement triggered outrage among English majors and word nerds alike, who argued that emojis aren't words.

Emojis may not be words to purists, but particular emojis – including the gun and knife varieties – are powerful enough to get their users in trouble, as happened to one middle schooler.

In response to being bullied in school, a 12-year-old girl from Fairfax, Va., posted a message on Instagram last December, laden with gun, bomb, and knife emojis. As a result, she was arrested and charged with computer harassment and threatening her school. It was the latest incident among many, in which police say they are having trouble distinguishing if threats are real, The Washington Post reported.

Although the Fairfax County Schools ultimately concluded the threat was not credible, the girl was still scheduled to make her first appearance in juvenile court on the charges. The outcome of the case is unclear however, since the hearings are not open to the public.

While emojis have been popularly embraced as a nuanced form of expression, and for many users have become a shorthand form of communicating thoughts, emotions, and responses, a raft of new legal issues have followed, with police increasingly having difficulties figuring out whether online ramblings equate to real threats.

In December 2014, Anthony Elonis was convicted and sentenced to 44 months in jail for violating the federal threats statute, after he posted multiple Facebook statuses threatening to kill his estranged wife who had left him and taken their children.

As the International Business Times reported, the court found that a reasonable listener would determine that the posts were a real threat, but the Supreme Court overturned his conviction in June 2015, setting a precedent by ruling that a person's criminal liability cannot be judged without looking at their mental state.

In another case, Osiris Aristy, a teenager from Brooklyn, New York, was arrested in January 2015, for posting several Facebook statuses featuring gun emojis pointing at an emoji of the police, alongside text. One post in particular read: "N***a run up on me, he gunna get blown down." The charges were dropped after a grand jury failed to indict.

“I think something is definitely lost in translation,” Aristy attorney Fred Pratt said of police efforts to interpret teens’ emoji use, according to the Post. “These kids are not threatening cops, they are just trying to say, ‘I’m tough.’ It’s posturing.”

While police are trying to judge just how seriously to take threatening messages using emojis, experts admit that there is a challenge determining what a defendant actually intended by sending a particular emoji.

Dalia Topelson Ritvo, assistant director of the Cyberlaw clinic at Harvard Law School told The Washington Post that “the girl’s message sounds threatening, but prosecutors and the judge will have to sort out whether the bomb, gun, and knife emoji indicated a desire to threaten the school, simply anger, or something else entirely.”

“You understand words in a particular way,” she said. “It’s challenging with symbols and images to unravel that.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How using a gun emoji can get you arrested
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0301/How-using-a-gun-emoji-can-get-you-arrested
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe