SpaceX selects 124 teams to compete to build supersonic Hyperloop pods

The Hyperloop, Elon Musk's proposed supersonic transportation system, is slowly becoming real. Judges from Musk's other companies, SpaceX and Tesla, will evaluate Hyperloop pod designs at Texas A&M University in January.

124 teams from 20 countries and 27 US states will compete to design a pod to travel through the proposed Hyperloop transportation system. Here, a conceptual drawing from SpaceX shows a small capsule zipping through the Hyperloop.

In 2013, SpaceX and Tesla co-founder Elon Musk announced the Hyperloop, an enclosed tube that would stretch for hundreds of miles between cities and allow people to travel at more than 700 miles per hour – jetting from Los Angeles to San Francisco, for example, in as little as half an hour.

Some critics at first dismissed the idea as impractical, but as engineers and scientists examined Mr. Musk’s white paper explaining the Hyperloop’s operation, they concluded it was worth pursuing.

Now, a consortium of aerospace engineers has designed an electric motor to power the prototype Hyperloop, a 1-kilometer test track is being built in Las Vegas, and SpaceX has selected 124 teams – mostly consisting of student engineers – to compete to design the pods that will travel through the Hyperloop.

Hyperloop works by reducing the pressure inside a straight tube and shooting a capsule through it at very high speed, using an air pump mounted on the capsule’s nose to reduce drag. The capsules will glide inside the tube on a layer of air, similar to the way a puck floats on an air-hockey table. The end result, Musk says, is a relatively affordable method of transportation that’s faster than air travel between cities that are close together.

The teams, which hail from 20 countries and 27 US states and have names such as “Pod People” and “Hullabaloop,” will present their concepts for Hyperloop pods at a competition to be held on January 29 and 30 at Texas A&M University. The teams will pitch designs and subsystems to a panel of judges from SpaceX, Tesla, and university engineering faculty, and one will be selected to build a prototype pod to run on a test track near SpaceX headquarters in California next summer.

Entrants not only have to come up with a feasible pod design; if they win, they have to find sponsors to actually build a prototype pod. “This is one of the problems where if you don’t tell the students it’s impossible they’ll figure out a way to do it,” Texas A&M professor of engineering Gregory Chamitoff told Ars Technica’s Eric Berger.

The two startup companies that are working on building the Hyperloop, Hyperloop Technologies and Hyperloop Transport Technologies, aren’t involved in the design competition. Both are building test tracks and plan to debut their own supersonic pod prototypes next year. But if the winning contest entry proves its viability, the companies may look to use that design instead – especially if it helps them to get an actual Hyperloop constructed more quickly.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to SpaceX selects 124 teams to compete to build supersonic Hyperloop pods
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today