US ratchets up car safety standards. Making room for self-driving cars?

With car fatalities dropping 36 percent in 10 years, the DOT hopes to keep that number falling by raising its standards.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, with new crash test dummies called 'THOR', speaks during the announcement for plans to update its safety rating system for new cars to include whether the car has technology to avoid crashes, in addition to how well it protects occupants in accidents in Washington.

We know that autonomous cars without steering wheels or pedals are likely in our future. But in some ways, they're already here, at least as building blocks that will ultimately allow cars to drive themselves.

There are features in cars now that ensure drivers stay in their lanes, adjust their speed on the highway, and automatically brake when they sense that a driver will otherwise hit something (or someone).

Technologies such as these have taken control out of the hands of drivers, who are responsible for 94 percent of crashes, making cars smarter and safer. Cars are getting so much safer, the US Highway Traffic Safety Administration calls it a “revolution.” In just the last decade, car fatalities have dropped 36 percent, it says.

Now, to help keep regulations on pace with innovation, the administration says it's “raising the bar” on its 5-Star Safety Ratings, which appear on the window stickers of new cars. This will encourage development of even more sophisticated safety technologies, it announced on December 8. The same technologies that will also help make driverless cars possible and safe.

Starting with 2019-model cars, the administration will take new crash prevention technologies into account when it crash-tests new cars to determine how well they protect drivers.

“Nudging and making it a little harder for folks to get a five star, by pushing the edges of what technology can do to make cars safer, is another part of our strategy,” US Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx told Wired.

By making it harder for cars to get top rankings, the government will help encourage car makers to get those features into more cars. This will in turn allow real-world testing of new autonomous features, help drive down their costs, and get drivers used to the idea of giving up control, as Wired pointed out, one of the biggest barriers to widespread adoption of driverless cars, some people think.

According to Russ Rader, spokesman for the industry trade group Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which has its own safety ratings system, roughly 50 percent of the luxury and affordable 2015 cars that the organization recently tested have automatic emergency braking or a collision warning feature, or both, at least as an option. This number grows every year, he says.

“We’ve made a lot of progress in how vehicles protect people when crashes happen,” Mr. Rader tells The Christian Science Monitor in an interview. “But the future is really looking to technology to prevent a lot of crashes from happening altogether.”

Though such technologies are instrumental to the development and widespread adoption of driverless cars, “full autonomy is a long time away,” says Rader.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to US ratchets up car safety standards. Making room for self-driving cars?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today