Skip to footer

6 inventors who regret their very successful creations

3. Dynamite

Barrie Maguire
File - Edited image of Barrie Maguire cartoon. A bunch of dynamite is on the ground with an open match book beside it, surrounded by "Save the Earth" environmental buttons illustrates article by Ed Hund on how terror tactics hurt the cause of all environmentalists.

  • By Tess Danielson Staff Writer

Alfred Nobel, the creator of the Nobel Peace Prize, may be associated with peace and unity today, but in the 1900s, his name was associated with violence and destruction.

After Mr. Nobel's brother was killed in an 1864 explosion, he researched safer, more stable explosive alternatives. This led him to invent dynamite. Nobel's innovative weapon earned him a large fortune, which he used to fund the Nobel Peace Prize. It is rumored that he created the award in atonement for his invention.

Nobel never meant for his creation to be an accelerator of war, in fact, he believed it would do the opposite: 

"Perhaps my factories will put an end to war sooner than your congresses: on the day that two army corps can mutually annihilate each other in a second, all civilised nations will surely recoil with horror and disband their troops."

Nobel never lived to see World War I and exactly how wrong he was.

3 of 6
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.