Google Glass aims for 'cool' with Ray-Ban, Oakley partnership

Google inked a deal with Luxottica, the biggest Google Glass eyewear partnership to date, and brings brands such as Ray-Ban and Oakley into Glass' corner. But will cool designs be enough to overcome Glass etiquette and pricing issues?

John Minchillo/File/AP
The new Google Glass "Bold" prescription frames in shale color are modeled at the Google Glass Basecamp space at Chelsea Market, Friday, Jan. 24, 2014, in New York. Google announced a partnership with Luxottica, which owns Ray Ban and Oakley, and will be releasing new Glass frame designs soon.

If cult classic “Risky Business” was filmed today, the infamous Tom-Cruise-dancing-in-his-underwear scene might play out a little differently.

“Ok Glass: Play ‘Old Time Rock and Roll,’ ” Tom Cruise would say, tapping the edge of his iconic square rimmed Ray-Ban Wayfarers.

Why? Google announced it is partnering with Ray-Ban and Oakley owner Luxottica Group to offer new design options for its soon-to-be-released Google Glass. But Google may have an etiquette and price factor that will work against it before the Wayfarer rockets Glass to the popularity Ray-Ban enjoyed in the mid-1980s.

Style, however, is the motivation behind Google’s new partnership.

“Light, simple and modular, Glass introduces new functionality as your glasses get smarter – but bringing your own style to Glass is just as important,” says the Google Glass team in a Google+ post Monday. “Luxottica understands how to build, distribute and sell great products that their clients and consumers love – something we care deeply about at Glass, too. They’ll bring design and manufacturing expertise to the mix, and, together, we’ll bring even more Glass style choices to our Explorers.”

Google says design is still in the works (“You’re not going to see Glass on your favorite Oakleys or Ray-Bans tomorrow,” it says) but they are hoping to release more designs in the future. Recently, Google released the “Titanium Collection” which offered new frame shape, color, and shades for Glass Explorers, creating more than 40 different customized options for Glass, the company says. The release also included the option for prescription lenses.

Luxottica, on the other hand, owns brands that have been a staple in eyewear for over half a century. The group has more than 5,000 retail stores in the US and has a diverse portfolio of brands including Oakley, Ray-Ban, Vogue-Eyewear, and Oliver Peoples. Oakley has already delved into wearable tech, with ski goggles that display an athlete’s speed, direction, and location.

“The first collection generated by this partnership will combine high-end technology with avant-garde design offering the best in style, quality and performance,” says Luxottica in a release on the partnership.

Style aside, Google still faces backlash from non-Explorers (the limited group of people testing and developing Glass) and could face pricing issues when partnering with outside eyewear groups.

After a confrontation at a San Francisco bar, a highly contested traffic ticket, and suspected movie piracy, Google released an etiquette guide for Glass users. The list included “ask permission” before filming, “don’t be rude”, and don’t “Glass-out”, its term for staring off into space (i.e. your Glass monitor).

Partnering with Glass could also bump up the price of already premium brands. The classic Ray-Ban Wayfarer sunglasses retail for $150 and the high-tech Oakley goggles mentioned above go for $650. Both prices are dwarfed by Google Glass, which currently costs $1,500, not including customized frames or prescription lenses.

That being said, Google is tirelessly making moves in the wearable tech department. Last week, it released Android Wear, a smart watch OS for two new smart watches to be released this summer.

With the wearable tech business skyrocketing to 90 million shipments by 2019, according to market-research firm ABI Research, however, Google may be playing by the tagline for the movie that launched Ray-Ban Wayfarers into the mainstream: “There's a time for playing it safe and a time for Risky Business.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.