Netflix speeds are down, some blame Verizon

Netflix says primetime streaming speeds on the Verizon FIOS network are down 14 percent. 

Reuters
The Netflix logo.

Netflix and Verizon are embroiled in a feud over video streaming traffic, and it appears as if Netflix users are the ones paying the price. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, Netflix wants broadband companies to support its platform without any additional fees. Unsurprisingly, the Journal notes, "the biggest US providers – Verizon, Comcast, Time Warner Cable and AT&T – have resisted, insisting on compensation." And as the providers and Netflix hash out their differences, streaming speeds are falling.

On Verizon's FIOS network, for instance, prime-time streaming speeds dropped 14 percent last month. 

Monitor readers will remember that earlier this month, tech expert David Raphael went public with claims that Verizon was intentionally throttling the bandwidth of big cloud services, such as Amazon's AWS, which helps support the Netflix network. "In my personal opinion, this is Verizon waging war against Netflix," Mr. Raphael wrote on his blog, after recounting a particularly testy exchange with a Verizon customer service representative. 

Verizon denied the claims, saying that it treated "all traffic equally."

But there can be little doubt that the carrier is less than thrilled with having to shoulder all that streaming traffic, especially at a time when streaming video continues to account for more and more bandwidth. (One study has shown that half of all Internet traffic in North America is taken up with YouTube and Netflix streams.) 

"Just using the Netflix example — it uses a lot of bandwidth and it takes money and a lot of infrastructure to support that, and it also has implications for the rest of the traffic," Jeff Silva, a telecommunications analyst at Medley Global Advisors, told NPR this week. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.