Facebook updates explicit content policy

Following outcry over a violent video, Facebook takes down a "death clip" and lays ground rules for future graphic content. Though that doesn't mean violent images are leaving timelines any time soon.

Reuters
Facebook on Friday rolled out its Timeline functionality. Here, the Facebook homepage.

Be wary Facebook users: beheadings may pop up on your newsfeed.

Facebook has clarified its explicit content policy, stating people are able to share graphic content – as long as it is shared to condemn it. The social media site has been flip flopping its policy over the last few months, as reports from the BBC and pressure from its safety advisors has highlighted the gray line Facebook walks as a conduit for shareable, sometimes questionable, information.

The issue started in May when the BBC asked Facebook about videos the site had allowed to be shared on the site depicting graphic violence. At the time, Facebook said, “its users had the right to depict the ‘world in which we live.’ ” However, following a later interview by the BBC with one of Facebook’s safety advisors who expressed concern over the graphic content, the site issued a statement saying they were taking down the content it had been alerted of, and would re-evaluate its policy.

This was the last Facebook users heard about it until Monday when the BBC reported that a graphic video, which was believed to be filmed in Mexico and showed a woman being beheaded by a man in a mask, was still up on the site despite users demanding it be taken down. On Monday, Facebook responded to the outrage confirming that the videos would remain on the site in order for users to “condemn” the violence, though it was considering adding a warning onto explicitly graphic content.

By Tuesday, however, it reversed its stance yet again, releasing a statement saying it was “strengthening” the enforcement of their policies. This will include taking a “holistic” look at the content in question, which includes taking into account the context in which it is uploaded, the user who is sharing the content, and whether or not it glorifies violence. If the content fails to meet these standards, it will be removed. The first example? The beheading video that sparked the most recent outcry was taken down yesterday.

Facebook’s Community Standards now states under the “Graphic Content” heading:

When people share any content, we expect that they will share in a responsible manner. That includes choosing carefully the audience for the content. For graphic videos, people should warn their audience about the nature of the content in the video so that their audience can make an informed choice about whether to watch it.

This also comes in light of Facebook’s recent privacy changes that allow anyone to be found on Facebook search, and teenagers’ content to be shared publicly.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.