Samsung applies for trademark on 'Galaxy Gear' smart watch

A Samsung 'Galaxy Gear' smart watch could arrive sooner than many analysts had expected. 

Reuters
A man using his mobile phone walks past a Samsung Electronics shop in the company's main office building in central Seoul, on July 23, 2013.

Samsung has submitted an application for a trademark on a "Galaxy Gear" watch. 

The US Patent and Trademark Office filing, which was spotted this week by IDG News Service, describes a "wearable digital electronic [device] in the form of a wristwatch, wrist band, or bangle capable of providing access to the Internet and for sending and receiving phone calls, electronic mails, and messages."

A smart watch, in other words. 

Samsung, of course, has already confirmed the existence of such a device. Speaking to Bloomberg News back in March, Lee Young Hee, executive vice president of Samsung’s mobile business, said that Samsung was "working very hard to get ready" for the launch of a Samsung smart watch, although he never went into detail on the launch date or specifications of the gadget. 

The "Galaxy Gear" watch wouldn't be the first wired timepiece on the market. Sony manufactures the Android-powered SmartWatch, and Pebble makes a popular line of Internet-connected watches. Meanwhile, Apple is rumored to be "aggressively" hiring developers and engineers to help the Cupertino company build an array of wearable tech. 

If true – and assuming Samsung does go through with its Galaxy Gear plans – the smart watch market could be the next front in the seemingly never-ending Samsung and Apple wars. 

In related news, Samsung on Monday mailed out invitations to a Sept. 4 product launch in Berlin. Smart money says the product in question will be a Galaxy Note III phablet – a follow-up to last year's extremely successful Galaxy Note II. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.