Can Apple stay on top? Investors, suppliers question its future.

Projections continue to suggest negative results for Apple, but what is preventing Apple from dominating the market like it used to?

Aly Song/Reuters/File
A man looks at his Apple iPad in front an Apple logo outside an Apple store in downtown Shanghai. Apple's luster is diminishing as it continues to lose market share to its competitors and face criticism from investors and suppliers.

As Apple continues to face growing competition, the company's allure is starting to fade in the eyes of investors and suppliers, according to new report from Reuters. Meanwhile, the once dominant tech giant is losing market share as Samsung and other rivals continue to grow. 

The concerns of shareholders apparently range from worries about smaller shipments to criticisms that the company has lost its innovative edge since iconic co-founder Steve Jobs died a year and a half ago.

Asian suppliers have told Reuters that they are trying to become less dependent on Apple as they encountered delays on deadlines from the company.

For the first time since December 2011, Apple’s stock closed last week below $400.

Apple will hold its financial conference call on quarterly results Tuesday afternoon. While Apple is still expected to show growth – estimates of quarterly revenue currently circle $42.77 billion – the projection is that Apple may be moving downward, Dan Moren of MacWorld reports.

"Apple is in some ways a sort of victim of its own success, especially when the term innovation starts being thrown around," says Charles Golvin, a principal analyst at Forrester Research. In other words, Apple, which has introduced multiple revolutionary products in the past, is under fire for not bringing an entirely different product to the market recently – or at least fast enough.

What seems to be preventing Apple from owning the market is its pricing for smart phones, Golvin says. Apple could benefit from having a range of smart phone prices, similar to the range of options that were available for the iPod

Another possible issue is Apple’s pattern of releasing new products every year, some of which had relatively minor adjustments. Golvin notes that it seems to be harder for Apple to continue that trend with Samsung and other competitors releasing products more often.

John Koetsier of VentureBeat expressed similar concerns with Apple’s dominance in the market in December. He emphasizes the need for a change in Apple’s market strategy, including more aggressive pricing, if the company expects to stay on top. 

He notes that while Apple has helped innovate the computer and electronics industry, they need to "fill available niches in the new ecosystem" to compete with rivals like Google and Samsung. 

The company is at risk of falling back into the lull it saw in the late 20th century, according to Mr. Koetsier. "The problem for Apple, if the current sales and market trends continue, is that iOS will get less and less important, relatively speaking," Koetsier said. "And those massive profits will start to wither away, start to follow the leaders — the new leaders — and we’ll be back to the 90s." 

For more tech news, follow Steph on Twitter: @stephmsolis

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.