Jose Luis Mangana/AP
The FTC reached a settlement with Google on Thursday when the search-engine company agreed to change the way it deals with rival companies. Here, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz gestures to a number of mobile devices during a news conference in Washington, D.C.

FTC says Google does not abuse its power

The FTC ended a 19-month investigation into Google's business practices, concluding that the company didn't violate antitrust law.

On Thursday the Federal Trade Commission ended a 19-month probe into Google’s business practices, a closely-watched effort to determine whether the search-engine giant violated antitrust laws. The verdict? Not guilty.

Google struck a deal with the FTC to put the probe to rest, volunteering to change the way it handles search results as well as agreeing to license some mobile phone patents to rival companies.

The antitrust investigation centered on the way Google treats its own products in its search results. Rival companies -- especially Microsoft, which runs the number-two search engine, Bing -- complained that Google was highlighting its own services, like business listings and its Google+ social network, while unfairly burying those of other companies on its search result pages.

The FTC disagreed. “Although some evidence suggested that Google was trying to eliminate competition, Google's primary reason for changing the look and feel of its search results to highlight its own products was to improve the user experience," FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz told CBS News.

Google reached a settlement with the FTC by agreeing to limit the ways it uses snippets of other companies’ content, as well as giving advertisers more control over how their ads are displayed. For years the company has argued that its use of these snippets -- things like reviews and summaries -- constitutes fair use. But several companies, including review site Yelp, complained about the way their material appeared on Google search pages. Now Google says that it will honor requests to exclude snippets from other sites in its searches.

In spite of this friction between Google and its rivals, the FTC stated that its investigation hadn’t found any indication that the company violated antitrust laws. The Commission noted in its statement that while “Google took aggressive actions to gain advantage over rival search providers ... the evidence did not demonstrate that Google’s actions in this area stifled competition in violation of U.S. law.”

The Commission also investigated how Google has been handling some of its mobile phone patents, especially those it acquired when it purchased Motorola Mobility last May. Rival companies -- including Microsoft, Apple, and Research in Motion, which makes BlackBerry -- complained that some of the patents Google acquired were essential to their own products. Google had been threatening injunctions against these companies, blocking them from using these “standards-essential” patents. But as part of its settlement, the company agreed to allow rivals to license these patents, even in cases where the patent would ultimately be used in a device that competes with one of Google’s own.

Google emerged from the investigation with its reputation more or less intact. That’s a good thing, if you ask the FTC, but probably frustrating to Google’s rivals -- especially Microsoft, which has been prodding the Commission to check Google’s perpetually-expanding online influence (and, to be sure, no stranger itself to anti-trust accusations).

For more tech news, follow Jeff on Twitter@jeffwardbailey.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to FTC says Google does not abuse its power
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today