Skip to main menu Skip to search Skip to footer
Menu
Menu

Twitter, ditched by Instagram, launches photo filters of its own

The war between Twitter and Instagram heats up. 

Twitter
Twitter has rolled out a new photo filtering tool.

  • By Matthew Shaer

Earlier this week, Instagram dropped support for "Twitter cards," a design feature that allowed users to embed multimedia content into their tweets.

The result: Instagram photos embedded on Twitter looked pretty weird. 

Now Twitter has launched a photo filter platform of its own, which it said would facilitate photo-sharing.

Photo-sharing and photo-filtering, of course, are Instagram's home turf. "Starting today, you’ll be able to edit and refine your photos, right from Twitter," Twitter's Coleen Baik wrote in a post on the company blog. "The latest versions of Twitter for iPhone and Twitter for Android introduce a few new ways to enhance the images you tweet." 

To summarize: Instagram slapped Twitter in the face, and Twitter said, "No problem, we don't need you anyway, buddy." 

‘The Daughters of Kobani’: A chronicle of the women who fought ISIS

We haven't tested out the Twitter filters, so we don't know how they stack up to Instagram's, but as Daniel Terdiman of CNET has noted, it's not impossible to imagine Twitter winning this particular battle. 

"Twitter has launched a very credible challenge to the crown," Terdiman writes. "To be sure, Instagram has a massive lead, and a very passionate community. But Twitter has a nine-figure user base, and now that it is offering filters -- albeit just eight, while Instagram has 18 free filters -- it can begin to chip away at its competitor's lead." 

In related news – hat tip to the Guardian – Twitter co-founder Biz Stone yesterday tweeted out a shot at Kevin Systrom, the CEO of Instagram. 

"Bummer my Instagram photo didn't show up on Twitter (Systrom Failure?)," Stone wrote. 

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism