Mac production (or at least some of it) will move to US, Cook says

Beginning next year, Apple will produce at least one Mac line at a US facility. 

Reuters
A man talks on a mobile phone in front of an Apple store in downtown Shanghai.

Apple will move part of its production chain to the US next year, Apple CEO Tim Cook said this week. 

Cook, who took over from Apple co-founder Steve Jobs in 2011, made his comments during interviews with Bloomberg Businessweek and NBC. According to Cook, Apple will invest $100 million in moving some of its manufacturing from China to US. As we've noted in the past, Apple has long been under pressure to source its production domestically – the topic even came up during the third presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney

"It's not known well that the engine for the iPhone and iPad is made in the US, and many of these are also exported-the engine, the processor," Cook told Bloomberg. (By engine, we assume Cook means the shiny metal guts that power the iPhone 5.) 

"The glass is made in Kentucky. And next year we are going to bring some production to the US on the Mac. We've been working on this for a long time, and we were getting closer to it. It will happen in 2013." 

Cook did not further expound on Apple's plan, so we don't know which Mac machine will be produced here, nor where in the US it will be produced. What we do know is that the factories in question probably won't look anything like the old Apple plants of yore

In related news, in early November, the tech site DigiTimes reported that Taiwanese manufacturer Foxconn, which supplies parts to Apple, is already conducting "evaluations" in Los Angeles and Detroit, in advance of a possible factory opening here.  

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.