Clara Schumann: Five ingredients for a child prodigy (+video)

5. Nurture

Melanie Stetson Freeman/The Christian Science Monitor
Physics teacher Brett Guisti works with a student at The Davidson Academy.

As this Onion article, titled "97-Year-Old Dies Unaware Of Being Violin Prodigy," hilariously points out, to become a violin prodigy, you need more than just memory, attention to detail, drive, and a rebellious streak. You also need someone to give you a violin.

We'll never know how many would-be musical prodigies lived and died under the rule of the Taliban, which bans almost all music. 

But refraining from actively discouraging prodigies is not enough. Even though prodigies tend to master their skill on their own, they still need tremendous amounts of support from their environment, and particularly their parents.

In her story titled, "Gifted students shine when mined," the Monitor's Stacy Teicher Khadaroo quotes Ruth Lyons, head teacher at the Renzulli Gifted and Talented Academy in Hartford, Conn. "In a lot of circumstances, high-potential students don't manifest their gifts unless they've been given the opportunity to develop them," she says.

Parents have been shown to have even more of an influence on child prodigies than teachers. All parenting involves a balancing act between expectations and freedom, and with the prodigy it's even more so.

And, as Winner notes, nurture is a two-way street. Prodigies evoke actions – often drastic ones like moving across the country – from their parents. She writes: "Family characteristics that may well profoundly shape the gifted child's development are at least in part set in motion by the presence of the gifted child. It is not only the family that creates the child: the child also plays a role in creating the family."

5 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.