Japanese attempt to unleash 2,300-foot whip on 'space junk' fails

As concerns grow about 'space junk,' a Japanese team tested a device meant to fish debris out of Earth's orbit. But their 700-meter long tether failed to deploy. 

TU Braunschweig/ AP/ File
An undated handout photo for the European Space Agency ESA shows a computer simulation made by the Institute for Air and Spacesystems at the Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany, of the distribution and movement of space debris at present and in future.

An experimental tactic to clean up “space junk” failed to get the job done, Japanese officials said Monday, marking a disappointing foray into efforts to trap and destroy tens of millions of pieces of debris circling the Earth.

Space junk, which consists predominantly of debris from satellites and rockets that has broken off during collisions and started orbiting the Earth, has become a growing problem for astronauts (see the 2013 movie, "Gravity.) While researchers estimate that more than 100 million pieces of the rubbish orbit the Earth, they don’t know the full extent of the issue – in part because the vast majority are smaller than a baseball, making the fragments difficult to detect and track down.

And those small pieces are likely more damaging than they would appear. The fragments can travel at speeds of up to 17,000 mph, allowing particles to move at velocities that could damage spacecraft, including the International Space Station (ISS) if they make contact, prompting scientists to search for new ways to try to catch and destroy the debris.

Researchers with the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency developed and began testing an electrodynamic, 700-meter-long tether-like device, which was designed to extend from the body of a cargo ship bringing supplies to astronauts at the ISS. They hoped the tether, which was made from thin wires of stainless steel and aluminium, would slow the orbiting trash down and catch it. The device would then carry the debris to a lower orbit, where it would enter the atmosphere and burn up before colliding with the Earth’s surface.

But after working for several days to release the tether, scientists gave up. On Monday, it re-entered the atmosphere aboard the vessel without capturing any space junk.

"We believe the tether did not get released," leading researcher Koichi Inoue told reporters, according to AFP. "It is certainly disappointing that we ended the mission without completing one of the main objectives."

The failure was another disappointment for Japanese space researchers, who aborted a mission intended to launch a satellite into orbit several weeks ago.

Scientists have considered other techniques to trap and destroy space junk, including using lasers to vaporize the debris or sending small satellites into space that would trap particles and combust along with them.

But none of these have ideas have proved a clear solution to the problem, and researchers worry that the issue will only escalate as the particles continues to collide with one another, breaking into smaller pieces that add to the collection of debris.

"There is a wide and strong expert consensus on the pressing need to act now to begin debris removal activities," Heiner Klinkrad, head of the European Space Agency's Space Debris Office, said in a statement at the 2013 European Conference on Space Debris, held in Germany. "Our understanding of the growing space debris problem can be compared with our understanding of the need to address Earth’s changing climate some 20 years ago."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.