Colonizing the moon? Meteor showers more frequent than expected

Scientists counted 222 new meteor impacts in seven years. The moon’s surface is changing considerably faster than previously thought, says a new study.

Reuters/ ESA/ NASA/ Handout via Reuters
The setting moon is seen in a photograph taken by Expedition 47 Flight Engineer Tim Peake of the European Space Agency (ESA) from the International Space Station on March 28, 2016 and released by NASA on April 4, 2016. Picture taken March 28, 2016.

At first glance, the moon’s mottled face appears vast and permanent – many of its craters have existed for billions of years. But new research suggests that the lunar landscape might be a far more dynamic place.

The moon’s surface is changing considerably faster than previously thought, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature. In the past seven years alone, falling meteorites have created at least 222 new craters on our beloved satellite. And that could be a serious problem for future lunar missions.

“It's just something that's happening all the time,” lead author Emerson Speyerer, a planetary scientist at Arizona State University in Tempe, told Nature.

When space rocks come hurtling toward Earth, they are partially or completely burned up upon contact with our atmosphere. But the moon has no atmosphere, so impacts there tend to be more frequent and powerful. Even small particles - reaching speeds of more than 1,000 m.p.h. - can make a significant dent in the lunar surface, .

But it doesn’t end there. When a meteorite slams the regolith, or lunar soil, the blast may dislodge surface rocks and send them flying. And those rocks can create lunar impact "splotches" of their own.

“For example, we found an 18-meter (59-foot) impact crater that formed on March 17, 2013, and it produced over 250 secondary impacts, some of which were at least 30 kilometers (18.6 miles) away,” Dr. Speyerer told

To determine the rate of crater formation, scientists analyzed more than 14,000 pairs of “before-and-after” images from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). Speyerer and colleagues observed 960,000 square miles, about 6 percent of the moon’s total surface area, to find subtle differences on the lunar surface.

“When looking at just a single image, many of the newly formed features are indistinguishable from their surroundings,” Dr. Speyerer told “It's only with these detailed comparisons with previous images that we can separate out these small surface changes.”

Previously, astronomers estimated that the regolith gets completely “churned” far less frequently, as rarely as about once every 10 million years. But new research suggests that the turnover occurs about 100 times faster – once every 81,000 years. “Geologically, that’s pretty fast,” Speyerer told the Los Angeles Times.

New revelations could help astronomers more accurately date craters and formations on the moon’s surface. But they may also affect future lunar missions.

“This is also important if we’re going to put a long term habitat on the moon, a lunar base or something like that,” Speyerer told the Los Angeles Times. “The odds of having a direct hit from a meteor or asteroidal material would be relatively small. However, if one occurred 30, 40 kilometers away, you might be getting a lot of these secondaries that are going to be coming over, hitting your lunar base and also messing up the regolith around you.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Colonizing the moon? Meteor showers more frequent than expected
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today