Turtle shells might not have evolved for protection, say scientists

Thanks in part to a fossil discovered by an eight-year-old, scientists have new insights into the mystery of why turtle shells evolved.

Courtesy of Andrey Atuchin
This is an artistic rendering of the early proto turtle Eunotosaurus (foreground) burrowing into the banks of a dried up pond to escape the harsh arid environment present 260 million years ago in South Africa. Meanwhile, a herd of Bradysaurus (background) congregates around the remaining muddy water.
Courtesy of Tyler R. Lyson
This is a new fossil of the oldest proto turtle, Eunotosaurus, discovered by then 8-year-old Kobus Snyman on his father's farm in the Karoo of South Africa suggest the turtle shell initially evolved not for protection, but rather as an adaptation for burrowing. The broadened ribs and the beginnings of the turtle shell provided Eunotosaurus with a stable base from which it could use its large hands and spatula shaped claws to burrow into the ground to escape the harsh arid environment found in South Africa 260 million years ago.
Courtesy of Luke Norton
A recent study on the oldest proto turtle, Eunotosaurus (left), suggests the broadening of the ribs in turtles was initially an adaptation for burrowing to escape the extremely arid environment of South Africa 260 million years ago. Later the ribs were incorporated into the modern protective turtle shell as found in Pelusios (right).

When it comes to evolution, things aren't always what they seem.

Today, the turtle's iconic shell forms a nearly impenetrable shield for the animal. After millions of years of turtles, it may seem as if it's always been that way. But the turtle's shell may not have actually evolved for protection.

Instead, the distinctive structure may have initially been an adaptation to help proto-turtles burrow underground, according to a paper published Thursday in the journal Current Biology.

"Why the turtle shell evolved is a very Dr. Seuss-like question and the answer seems pretty obvious – it was for protection," lead author Tyler Lyson, curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, said in a press release. But it turns out, "the earliest beginnings of the turtle shell was not for protection but rather for digging underground to escape the harsh South African environment where these early proto turtles lived."

Broad ribs that later evolved into turtle shells likely helped the South African turtle-ancestor Eunotosaurus africanus stabilize its body as it dug into the ground with its front legs.

"A stable base is needed to counteract the force of the digging mechanism, in this case the forelimbs," Dr. Lyson explained to Seeker, a news site owned by Discovery Digital Networks. "Digging animals thus have adaptations to dig burrows (large hands, large claws, strong forelimbs, etc.) and adaptations to deal with counteracting the digging mechanism force."

Previous research had already suggested that broadening ribs in turtle-ancestors eventually evolved into the protective shell that turtles have today. But ribs would have provided little protection at first, so Lyson puzzled over what purpose these broadened ribs could have served for the proto-turtles.

Lyson and colleagues studied 47 fossils of Eunotosaurus in an effort to determine what exactly these ancient animals were doing with those wide ribs.

At the center of this collection was a fossil discovered by Kobus Snyman, a South African boy who was eight years old when he discovered the 260-million-year-old specimen. The boy found the proto-turtle fossil on his father's farm on the Western Cape of South Africa before taking it to the Fransie Pienaar Museum in Prince Albert.

Without this specimen, "This study would not have been possible," study co-author Bruce Rubidge of the University of Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg said in a press release.

The boy had found a fossil of the entire body of the proto-turtle, including its hands and feet. And these body parts proved crucial to Lyson's study of Eunotosaurus.

It turns out, the prehistoric animal was built like a digger. 

The front limbs of Eunotosaurus were thicker, with larger feet than its hind ones. Not only did the animal have particularly sturdy forelimbs, Lyson spotted big claws good for breaking up dirt and features on the shoulder blades and forearms that suggest this proto-turtle had strong triceps.

"Eunotosaurus was clearly digging," Rainer Schoch of the State Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart, Germany told the Atlantic. "The big question is whether the early turtles with partially formed shell – Pappochelys and Odontochelys – were too. This is important to know because they represent the stages in which the shell actually formed."

If Lyson is right, the turtle's shell might be a good example of exaptation, when a trait is co-opted for a new purpose throughout evolution.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Turtle shells might not have evolved for protection, say scientists
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today