US back on moon, with difficult landing for first private-sector craft

|
Intuitive Machines/AP
Intuitive Machines’ ‘Odysseus’ lunar lander is shown with Earth in the background, Feb. 16, 2024. The image was captured shortly after separation from SpaceX's second stage on Intuitive Machines’ first journey to the moon.

More than 50 years after the last Apollo mission, an American spacecraft is back on the moon, marking the first lunar landing by any private company and a step toward the hoped-for return of humans to the lunar surface.

The uncrewed craft, nicknamed Odysseus or “Odie” for short, touched down in the moon’s south pole region Feb. 22 at about 6:23 p.m. amid technical and communication challenges that arose. 

On Friday morning the lander’s maker, Texas-based Intuitive Machines, posted on X (formerly Twitter) that “Odysseus is alive and well. Flight controllers are communicating and commanding the vehicle to download science data.” But the company added that it was continuing to learn more about the craft’s “overall health” and specific location. The vehicle’s solar power is working.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

The first lunar spacecraft landing by a private company is a milestone, even if technical challenges highlight the difficulty of space exploration.

Intuitive Machines reported that Odysseus tipped on its side during landing. On Feb. 27 the company said the lander has "efficiently sent payload science data and imagery in furtherance of the Company’s mission objectives," but that battery power will likely run out on Feb. 28, earlier than hoped.

The arrival of such payloads – Odie contains instruments and research experiments – is seen by many as the next giant leap in an era of rising interest in the moon and in commercial space exploration. 

“If these companies ... have developed new technologies that can be efficiently, inexpensively constructed, then the cost per flight will go down,” says David Kring, principal scientist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, where Intuitive Machines is headquartered. “And if the cost per flight goes down, then we’ll be able to do greater science for the same amount of money.”

Much has changed since 1972. Scientists have made huge technological advances. More nations are pursuing space exploration. And doors have opened for private companies to play a growing role in seeking lower-cost paths to success. 

Failure is part of the journey, too. Three recent moon landing attempts by U.S., Russian, and Japanese companies flopped. 

The Odysseus mission is one of several that NASA tapped Intuitive Machines to do, in a contract awarded three years ago. The craft was launched from the Kennedy Space Center aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on Feb. 15.   

Rising “lunar economy”?

Key goals of this new era of exploration are to create what NASA calls a lunar economy, with projects and equipment that will “pave the way for a sustainable human presence on and around the moon,” according to Intuitive Machines. This mission is part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative and Artemis program, which has a long-term goal of establishing a permanent base on the moon. This would help pave the way for a human mission to Mars.

With decades having passed since the Apollo missions, scientists see plenty to do. 

“We have 50-plus years of questions,” says Benjamin Greenhagen, a scientist with the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.  

Odysseus separated from the launch rocket about an hour after takeoff a week ago. The lander ignited its engine about 18 hours into the flight and felt the moon’s gravitational pull once it covered the roughly 250,000-mile distance from Earth. Odysseus aimed to touch down near the lunar feature called Malapert A, a relatively flat region in the otherwise heavily cratered area that’s visible from Earth. Scientists are particularly interested in the little-explored south pole region and its water ice. 

“We’re going after scientific and technology studies that weren’t even envisioned back in the time of Apollo,” said Joel Kearns, an official in NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, in a pre-touchdown press conference.  

The aim is for the lander to function on the moon’s surface for seven days, until lunar night falls, when it will be too cold to operate. Odysseus is a hexagonal cylinder with six legs, about 14 feet tall and 5 feet wide. Minus the legs, it’s roughly the size of a British telephone booth (an apt analogy for fans of “Doctor Who”). 

Odysseus is the most recent creation in NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, sponsoring private companies to build lunar landers. “In CLPS, American companies used their own engineering and manufacturing practices instead of adherence to formal and traditional NASA procedures and NASA oversight,” Mr. Kearns said in the briefing. 

NASA paid Intuitive Machines around $118 million to carry out this lunar mission and spent another $11 million to develop and build six instruments it put on the flight. A traditional NASA mission reportedly can cost around $500 million to $1 billion. The craft carried six NASA payloads and six commercial payloads – scientific instruments or cargo – to the moon.

From sculpture to radio-wave test

One key mission goal is to evaluate the lunar environment with a radio receiver system and stereo camera system. Scientists are interested in measuring radio waves on the far side of the moon, the quiet side, which hasn’t been measured since 1973, says Dr. Kring. 

“If the far side is, in fact, radio quiet, and we are eventually able to deploy a radio telescope, we will be able to peer far deeper into the origin of the universe than any telescope has done in the past,” he says. 

The plan isn’t just for science experiments on the moon’s surface. The commercial payloads had hoped to deliver a commemorative sculpture by Jeff Koons. Some panels of the lander are insulated by material supplied by Columbia Sportswear to guard against the moon’s extreme temperatures. 

Future steps may include rovers, attempts to have a craft survive the lunar night, or potentially hoppers that can explore hard-to-reach craters, says Mr. Greenhagen. 

Perhaps the most important potential of missions like Odysseus is to kindle dreams for the next generation of astronauts.

“The lunar spacecraft community has largely retired, ... so we needed to train and, through experience, develop a new generation of space explorers,” says Dr. Kring. “NASA’s CLPS program and Intuitive Machines’ successful landing are great first steps.”

Editor's note: This story was updated on Feb. 27 with new information about the craft communicating after landing on its side, and the status of the sculpture by Jeff Koons. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US back on moon, with difficult landing for first private-sector craft
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2024/0223/US-back-on-moon-with-difficult-landing-for-first-private-sector-craft
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe