What an ancient comet collision teaches us about global warming

A comet impact 56 million years ago on Earth contributed to global warming, say scientists after studying tiny glass spheres, or microtektites, found in ancient sediment from a period of massive climate change.

Rensselaer Polytechnic/AP
This rock, heated by cosmic crash 56 million years ago that set off massive global warming, may hold clues for understanding present climate change.

Nearly 56 million years ago, something strange happened on Earth. Carbon filled the atmosphere, and oceans rose and became more acidic. Global temperatures climbed.

This event is known to scientists as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), a period in which the Earth exhibited signs of ancient global warming. Without humans to contribute carbon dioxide and other gasses to the atmosphere, however, what could have caused this shift?

A team of American researchers went back to the basics in their search for an answer: They examined sediment from that time period in search of clues. What they found were microtektites, small, glassy, spherical pieces that are usually formed during asteroid impacts.

"This tells us that there was an extraterrestrial impact at the time this sediment was deposited – a space rock hit the planet," Morgan Schaller, the co-author of a paper published Friday in the journal Science and an assistant professor of earth and environmental sciences at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, said in a press release. "The coincidence of an impact with a major climate change is nothing short of remarkable."

Microtektites can form when an extraterrestrial impact occurs, melting and vaporizing the ground, and throwing molten ejecta into the air, where they solidify before falling down. Some of the microtektites contained "shocked quartz," a sign of intense pressure.

The size of the strewn field, or the area in which microtektites are found, can be indicative of the size of the impact. In this instance, study authors found the tiny spheres along the East Coast in New Jersey and Bermuda, about 700 miles apart.

While scientists are not definite about the link between the dramatic climate shifts and the impact that could have created the microtektites, the new paper's team argue that evidence could possibly indicate causation. Comets carry a carbon isotope known as Carbon-12, which became abundant in the PETM era, as temperatures and ocean levels climbed.

One of the study’s authors, Earth magnetism researcher Dennis Kent, has argued for more than a decade that a comet might have triggered ancient climate change. Dr. Kent believes that a comet impact like the one that created the microtektites could have released carbon into the atmosphere, triggering a feedback loop that rapidly warmed the Earth, The Washington Post reports.

Other scientists, however, say that it is unlikely that the relatively small impact indicated by the microtektites would have caused such a massive climate shift. Other explanations include increased volcanism.

Alongside the massive climate shift came the extinction of dozens of species, and the proliferation of mammals and other animals that might seem more recognizable to us today. The BBC reports that higher world temperatures allowed these animal species to spread across the globe and expand their range towards the poles.

While modern humans hardly spare a second thought for potential extraterrestrial impacts, comets and meteors still speed by the Earth, from a massive meteor impact off the coast of Brazil to a huge comet that passed by the Earth in March, to relatively little fanfare

Yet while modern scientists may be concerned about some future impacts, the team involved in the discovery of the Atlantic microtektites were excited.

"I went to the lab and dumped a sample on the sorting tray without sieving it, and there it was," Dr. Schaller said, according to a press release. "It was a stunning moment. I knew what I was looking at was not normal."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.