Watch this fiery NASA rocket booster in unprecedented detail

How do you capture an image of a fiery rocket without overexposing the picture? NASA had an idea – and it worked.

NASA just solved its exposure problem – and the result is spectacular.

If you try to snap a picture of a rocket launch, the flames shooting out of the end of the craft will be so bright that they will look like just a whitish blob in the resulting image. 

That image is fine for memories and to demonstrate just how fiery a rocket launch can be, but for researchers who want to see if everything went smoothly during a test, the bright blotch obscures much of the scene.

So researchers began designing a new video camera that could account for that overexposure without darkening the rest of the image. And it works, the space agency announced Saturday.

The plume of fire that shoots out of a rocket motor is so bright that any camera attempting to film a launch or a test will have to dramatically reduce its exposure settings to avoid capturing a washed-out image. But that makes the whole image darker, not just the bright flames, and scientists can't see much of the motor to see if its components worked as they were supposed to. 

One reason it has been difficult to capture an image that is neither overexposed nor underexposed is that video cameras typically use just one exposure at a time. But engineers found a way around that challenge.

The High Dynamic Range Stereo X (HiDyRS-X) project designed a video camera that can record multiple, slow motion images at the same time. Then these images are combined to create an evenly exposed video.

Images courtesy of NASA
This is a composite image of two views of NASA's recent full-scale test of its Space Launch System (SLS) booster. The top image was taken without using the HiDyRS-X camera, and the bottom was from the HiDyRS-X camera.

When NASA did a full-scale test of its Space Launch System (SLS)'s booster, the engineers had an opportunity to test their new camera. 

Before the big day, the researchers had practiced and reviewed the start procedures for using the HiDyRS-X camera, but nonetheless the team hit a couple of snags on the day of the test.

The researchers had set up an automatic timer to go off when the booster test began. The booster fired up its engines, but inside the HiDyRS-X camera, nothing happened. 

But the engineers moved quickly and manually overrode the timer to start the camera, just missing the beginning of the rocket booster test. 

Then, partway through the test, the powerful rocket booster caused such shakes and quakes that the camera's power source disconnected. 

"I was bummed," Howard Conyers, a structural dynamist at NASA's Stennis Space Center, said in a NASA press release. "Especially because we did not experience any failures during the dry runs."

But that frustration quickly faded when Dr. Conyers and his team saw the footage their camera had captured.

"I was able to clearly see the exhaust plume, nozzle, and the nozzle fabric go through its gimbaling patterns, which is an expected condition, but usually unobservable in slow motion or normal playback rates," Conyers said.

Despite the start and power problems, the test had proved that the camera itself accomplished its goals: It offered a never-before-seen view of rocket motor tests. The researchers saw the rocket in a completely new light.

"Failure during testing of the camera is the opportunity to get smarter," Conyers said. "Without failure, technology and innovation is not possible."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.