Humpback whales: Are they altruistic mammals?

Humpback whales have been found to protect other species from killer whales, even when fresh krill is nearby.

Nick Ut/AP/File
A humpback whale breaches close to a whale-watching boat off the coast of Long Beach, Calif. A recent study suggests Humpback whales may be altruistic when it comes to protecting calves from killer whales.

In black-and-white uniforms, humpback whales are the ocean's first responders, at least when it comes to orca attacks.

Marine ecologist Robert Pitman observed this behavior in 2009 when a pod of killer whales knocked a seal off an ice floe in Antarctica, but was prevented from killing it by a humpback, who lifted the seal and placed it on its belly to keep it out of water until it was out of harm’s way.

Dr. Pitman and his team analyzed 115 such rescue incidents from published and unpublished sources for a paper published in last month’s issue of Marine Mammal Science. Their goal: To understand exactly how and why humpback whales go out of their way to become small-creature-saving heroes.

Are the whales responding based on personal history or experience with orcas? The study finds that only 11 percent of orca victims that humpback whales tried to save were humpback whale calves; they aren't just protecting their own. Other marine creatures that humpbacks have saved include gray whales, harbor seals, California sea lions, and ocean sunfish, raising questions about whether the ocean giants are altruistic toward other species.

Interspecific altruism, even if unintentional, could not be ruled out,” the researchers report. 

Humpback whales are the “only cetacean that deliberately approaches attacking [mammal-eating killer whales] and can drive them off,” the study notes. Studies have recently shown that orcas regularly attack humpback calves and juveniles, but rarely the adults.

Still, personal history could influence a humpback’s decision to intervene. Many that do attack orcas bear scars from their younger years, Alisa Schulman-Janiger, a whale researcher with the California Killer Whale Project who coauthored the study, told National Geographic. As adults, they could act protectively to help younger whales make it through their most vulnerable stage. Responding to non-humpback victims could be accidental: humpbacks could be responding to the killer whale’s auditory signal, rather than to the species in trouble, for example.

Humpbacks, however, could truly be altruistic. “Although this behavior is very interesting, I don’t find it completely surprising that a cetacean would intervene to help a member of another species,” Lori Marino, an expert in cetacean intelligence and president of the Whale Sanctuary Project, told National Geographic.

Ms. Marino described humpbacks as intelligent problem-solvers and communicators. “So, taken altogether, these attributes are those of a species with a highly developed degree of general intelligence capable of empathic responses,” she said.

Altruism is not unique to humans. As The Christian Science Monitor reported, even rats have been found to display altruistic and prosocial behavior.

Scientists are moving toward a startling conclusion: humans can no longer claim that they are the only ones with an elevated sense of morality. For instance, studies have found that chimpanzees will give food to one another when given the opportunitySo will dogs.

Scientists are learning that prosocial behavior, that is helping others with no direct personal benefit for oneself, is far more common than previously imagined in the animal kingdom. 

Because it’s difficult to conduct controlled experiments with 30- to 50-ton humpback whales, however, no conclusions can yet be drawn about their motives. “As biologists,” Pitman told National Geographic, “that is where we should start our search for explanations.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.