The newest weapon in the Asian carp battle: Alligator fish

Some biologists call it a win-win: Introduce an ugly fish that went extinct in the Midwest last century, and it might eat the so far unstoppable Asian carp. But others aren't sure it will help solve the invasive fish problem.

Rogelio V. Solis/AP
US Fish and Wildlife Service fish biologist Daniel Schwarz, left, maintenance mechanic Ronnie Schutkesting, release an alligator gar in a special transportation tank at the Private John Allen National Fish Hatchery in Tupelo, Miss., on July 6. Several male and female adult alligator gar are captured in fresh water lakes and rivers and are brought to the facility so they can lay and fertilize the eggs as biologists and environmentalists are working to reintroduce the once-reviled alligator gar as a weapon against the invasive Asian carp.

The alligator gar is a tough fish to love. The long snout, two rows of teeth, and scales so sharp Native Americans used them as arrowheads, all make the decision by several Midwestern states to reintroduce the "river monster" difficult to understand.

Yet reintroduction of the ugly alligator fish to the upper Midwest represents not only the return of a native species once declared extinct in several states, but also a path forward in the ever-more creative fight against a more feared enemy: the Asian carp.

“What else is going to be able to eat those monster carp?” Allyse Ferrara, who studies alligator gar at Nicholls State University in Louisiana, told the Associated Press. “We haven’t found any other way to control them.”

The Asian carp is a hefty bottom-dweller known for smacking fisherman with a slippery tail when it leaps suddenly out of the water. Originally introduced in the 1970s to help with catfish farms in Arkansas, the large fish swam north and now infests the waters of the Mississippi River. Their expansion alarms both biologists and commercial fisherman, who fear the rapidly reproducing "garbage fish" will enter the Great Lakes and destroy a unique ecosystem – and a $7 billion fishing industry.

Efforts to stop this have been numerous and varied. Over President Obama's objections, Congress allotted $300 million to a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, a fund started in 2010 over concerns about the Asian carp. This money contributes to catching and netting efforts, an electric fence in the Illinois River near Chicago, and the ongoing building of a "lock and dam" system by the US Army Corps. 

In May, a coalition of federal, state, and local officials, companies, and nonprofits completed the first-ever fish wall in Indiana. The 7.5-foot earthen wall separates rivers that Asian carp may traverse from a watershed that biologists called "a back door to Lake Erie," The Christian Science Monitor reported.

But officials would ultimately like to stop the Asian carp, not just contain it. The alligator gar can grow as long as an African elephant is tall, making it a potential match for the carp. They have demonstrated a taste for young carp in particular, and unlike Asian carp, they pose no threat to humans, National Geographic reported, although their eyes and eggs are poisonous.  

Several Midwestern states have launched reintroduction programs for the alligator gar, and Illinois lawmakers passed a resolution earlier in July promising to protect the gar species already present in the state, the AP reported.

Some biologists urge caution in seeing the alligator gar as the "silver bullet" against the Asian carp. But it could offer biologists one more tool to use in containing the invasive fish, while reintroducing a native species that will excite trophy fishermen.

It would not be the first time biologists have used the promise of a predator's diet to drum up support for an endangered, but unwanted, animal. The Lake Erie Water Snake, another species native to the Midwest, recovered and left the Endangered Species list after it began eating the invasive round goby fish, says Richard King, a conservation biologist at Northern Illinois University.

"That's what I tell people who don't like snakes," Dr. King tells the Monitor, speaking of conservation work with the water snake. "I say, 'It eats the invasive round goby.' "

If the alligator gar can prove themselves equally useful, they, too, could lose their colloquial designation of "river monster." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to