Can drones help save the whales?

Drones helped NOAA researchers in the Hawaiian Island, helping them to count the whale calves without disturbing them, a growing trend in wildlife research.

NOAA Fisheries/Vancouver Aquarium/AP/File
This September 2015 photo provided by NOAA Fisheries shows an adult female orca, identified as L-91, eating a salmon as her newborn calf swims near the San Juan Islands in Washington state's Puget Sound. Federal biologists flying a drone have taken thousands of rich images of endangered Puget Sound orcas.

Ecologists used drones to create more accurate lists of the whale and dolphin pods near Hawaii for the first time this summer.

And if drones can help save the whales, what else can they do?

Drones entered the public consciousness either as military weapons or as an obscure hobby that occasionally crash-landed on the White House lawn. The drone involvement with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's recent whale-watching expedition is a window into a growing list of nonmilitary functions for the drones, which play an increasing role in police work, real estate, or even firefighting.

Drone use in animal research and other forms of ecology is in its early stages, as researchers work with both the technology and process, improving their observational reach via drone. 

"I believe that drones for conservation and research are akin to the invention of the microscope for cellular biology," said Iain Kerr, the chief executive officer of the whale and ocean research organization Ocean Alliance, during an interview with UAS Vision. Dr. Kerr uses a DJI Phantom drone to collect not only photos, but also DNA and respiratory information, from blue whales in the Sea of Cortez.

"If we truly want to understand what effects humanity is having on wildlife we need to study them in a non-invasive manner," Kerr said. "Today's drones are the ultimate realization of non-invasive research."

For Hawaii researchers, camera drones could produce better wildlife photos than photographers on boats, they told the Associated Press, because the drones do not disturb the whales. This is an important requirement for drones used in wildlife observation, as they must be engineered to avoid disturbing the animals themselves, according to engineers with the University of Florida's Unmanned Aircraft Systems Research Program.

The Hawaii research relied on a hexacopter drone, which can carry larger and higher quality cameras than more common hobby drones, according to Dronebly. The higher power level better suits them to the rough winds and seas where the NOAA researchers were operating.

Using drones enabled NOAA scientists to operate from a large, single boat during a month-long mission around Hawaii's outlying islands. Before they might have taken several smaller boats, which maneuver more easily around the marine mammals but can also be a liability in the often severe weather around the Hawaiian Islands.

The new perspective from a drone helped NOAA oceanographers catalogue the whale groups more accurately, even showing mothers with calves. Such counts are essential to gauge the health of the whale population as a whole, but locating the young whales is often a challenge because they stay beneath the surface.

They are not the only researchers to discover that drones can extend the reach of science by producing closer shots of shy animals.

One early drone encounter with whale research occurred accidentally. A group of students from Auckland’s University of Technology were using a special water-proof camera drone called a Hex H20 to study dolphins off the northern coast of New Zealand, CNN reported. Mid-way through their shoot, the students saw a rare Bryde's Whale, and they readjusted the drone to take a closer look.

"Never before have I seen anything like this," Barbara Bollard-Breen, the student research supervisor and a geospatial science professor, told The Independent. "There is no way we would see so much detail from a boat-based survey." 

The drone caught the adult whale feeding a calf and dipping beneath the water from just 40 meters up, using the zoom feature to take a closer look that researchers said would have been impossible but for the drone.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.