History of human trade is written in camel genes

A new study finds that one-humped camels' genetic diversity may have been influenced by their role in ancient caravans.

Richard Drew/AP
Two of the dromedaries for the 'Living Nativity' scene of the 'Radio City Christmas Special' walk under the marquee of New York's Radio City Music Hall. Humans and camels have worked and traveled together for so long that ancient trading routes may have altered dromedary genes.

Our influence on domesticated animals may be written in their genes, if the camel is a good measuring stick.

In fact, ancient trade routes may have shaped the current genetic diversity of one-humped camels, or dromedaries, according to a new study.

Despite the fact that camels have been an essential part of human societies in desert regions for thousands of years, little was known about their evolutionary history and genetic diversity. So a team of researchers dug into the DNA of 1,083 extant camels and compared it with ancient DNA samples from wild and early-domesticated camels for clues. 

These camels were from disparate locations, including various regions of Africa, different regions of the Arabian Peninsula, southern Asia, and Australia, but they had remarkably similar genetics across different continents, according to a paper published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"They have moved with people, through trading," study co-author Olivier Hanotte, a professor of genetics and conservation at Nottingham University, told BBC News. "So by analysing dromedaries, we can find a signature of our own past."

Dr. Hanotte explains that a sort of genetic "shuffling" occurred along caravan routes over centuries.

"People would travel hundreds of miles with their camels carrying all their precious goods. And when they reached the Mediterranean, the animals would be exhausted," he said, "So they would leave those animals to recover and take new animals for their return journey." 

Although the ancestors of the domesticated dromedaries likely originated in the southeast Arabian Peninsula, the study authors also find support for a "restocking from the wild" hypothesis. 

In that scenario, camels would have first been domesticated in the southeast Arabian Peninsula and then continued interbreeding with now-extinct populations of wild dromedaries across the ancient trade routes. As a result, today's camels have a significant amount of genetic diversity.

This genetic diversity could be advantageous for the single-humped camels, as it could help them better adapt to a changing environment. 

"Climate change, for example, is characterised by rising temperatures, more extreme weather patterns and more areas becoming less suitable for livestock," Hanotte said. "The dromedary will be our better option for livestock production – of meat and milk. It could replace cattle and even sheep and goats that are less well-adapted."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.