Surprise! Scientists discover coral reef at mouth of Amazon River

Scientists have discovered a coral reef in the muddy, sediment-filled waters at the mouth of the Amazon River. 

David Gray/Reuters/File
Peter Gash, owner and manager of the Lady Elliot Island Eco Resort, snorkles during an nspection of the Great Barrier Reef's condition in an area called the 'Coral Gardens,' located at Lady Elliot Island, Australia, in 2015.

Scientists have made a discovery that even they can’t believe: a coral reef in the muddy waters at the mouth of the Amazon River. And it is thriving.

The scientists who found the 3,700 square mile reef were astounded by its size, and most of all, its ability to exist where it shouldn’t: in sediment-filled brackish water.

"We found a reef where the textbooks said there shouldn't be one," said Fabiano Thompson, a co-author of the study published on Friday in the journal Science.

Researchers have considered the possibility of a coral reef existing in that location for a long time. When the research team made the discovery, one of the members was carrying a research paper from 1977 that speculated a coral reef existing at the mouth of the Amazon.

Brazilian scientist Rodrigo Moura of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro discovered the reef in 2012, when he dredged a small area offshore as part of a larger study of the Amazon River.

But this coral reef may look little like the Great Barrier Reef (pictured above) and other tropical reefs beloved of scuba divers.

Actually, even the researchers who spent years learning about the Amazon reef aren't sure what it looks like. With 300,000 cubic meters of fresh water flowing through it every second, the current is too swift, and the sediment too thick, for scientists to dive down and observe the 50-100 meter deep reef.

Due to the sediment-rich waters, the reef exists without the elements scientists typically assume are necessary for coral reef growth. Access to light, for example, is blocked by the suspended mud and sand. In many places, there is also little oxygen or photosynthesis.

And yet, when scientists began to study the flora and fauna of the reef, they found sea fans and colorful fish, sponges, and rhodoliths.

Although researchers say that for a reef this size, the Amazon reef is not tremendously diverse, scientists were amazed at the animals they were discovering.

"We brought up the most amazing animals I've ever seen on an expedition like this," said Dr. Patricia Yager of the University of Georgia to National Geographic. "All the scientists just hung over the rails, amazed at what we were finding."

Although scientists initially assumed that the sediment washed into the ocean by the Amazon would suffocate coral, the river's strong current and the depth of the reef prevents the sediment from settling and choking the sponges and other reef life.

In some places, the reef is impacted by the sediment, though not to a damaging degree. And scientists say there is still more to learn from the reef.

"We've only surveyed 900 kilometers," said Thompson, which constitutes about 10 percent of the reef. "We need to go back there 20 more times."

This unexpected reef can teach us quite a bit, say the researchers.

It may be a stepping stone reef between the Brazilian reefs and the Caribbean reefs, reports the Los Angeles Times, allowing animals to move between them.

The conditions of the Amazon reef can also provide lessons about how delicate coral reefs can thrive in adversity, and how they could respond to changing ocean conditions as the sea acidifies.

Like reefs around the world, the Amazon reef faces both natural threats and human threats, including one new challenge that worries scientists who are invested in understanding the reef.

According to the study, 80 blocks of seafloor near the reef have been acquired for oil drilling, 20 of which are already producing oil.

“Such large-scale industrial activities present a major environmental challenge,” wrote the authors in the study, “and companies should catalyze a more complete social-ecological assessment of the system before impacts become extensive and conflicts among the stakeholders escalate.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.