This tiny dragonfly migrates the longest distance of any insect

New research suggests that Pantala flavescens, a dragonfly barely an inch and a half long, is migrating across oceans and between continents, overtaking the monarch butterfly as the insect that migrates the farthest.

Greg Lasley
The body and wings of the dragonfly Pantala flavescens have evolved in a way that lets the insect glide extraordinary distances on weather currents.

A small dragonfly is thought to be crisscrossing the globe, according to new research, potentially migrating distances to rival even birds, the masters of winged migration.

The study, published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE, analyzed the genetics of groups of Pantala flavescens from almost every corner of the globe, and found the little beasts were startlingly similar, no matter where they came from.

There was only one conclusion to be drawn: The dragonflies must be launching themselves into the air and gliding, flapping, cruising their way between continents.

“A few years ago, doing my PhD, I was traveling the world and collecting dragonfly samples, and I found this species all over,” says senior author Jessica Ware, assistant professor of biology at Rutgers University-Newark, in a telephone interview with The Christian Science Monitor. “But there was no way to prove anything about migration without genetic analysis.”

In fact, literature had long suggested that Pantala might be crossing the Indian Ocean in swarms.

Then, in 2012, a group of researchers led by Keith Hobson used isotope analysis to support this theory, concluding that the dragonflies were probably migrating between India and Africa, a trip that “could possibly involve a remarkable trans-Himalayan high-altitude traverse.

And so we come to the latest study, in which Dr. Ware and her team collected Pantala samples from all over the world, carried out genetic analysis and concluded “this is one giant population, worldwide.”

“They were so closely related that it implied they were freely interbreeding – as in, ones from Guyana were breeding with ones in the US, which were breeding with ones in Japan, et cetera,” Ware tells the Monitor.

“Usually, you’d expect there would be neighborhoods, breeding with someone close to you. But it seems they’re just as likely to mate with individuals from another continent.”

Hobson and his team, back in 2012, hypothesized the dragonflies were accomplishing “this remarkable feat by riding high-altitude winds,” and Ware talks in a similar way, marveling at how the bugs “really take advantage of the wind.”

But why would they do this?

After all, it is hardly a risk-free strategy, launching oneself into the air and traversing oceans, when one measures barely an inch and a half in length.

Moreover, as Ware points out, Pantala is unable to swim in salt water, so if they take a tumble on their epic journey, they may wish they had stayed at home.

“It’s a strategy – dispersing far and wide,” explains Ware. “They’re moving around to mix up the genetics, trying to ensure the survival of the species. And it’s worked! They’re on every continent apart from Antarctica.”

Ideally, Ware tells the Monitor, they would expand their genetic tests, encompass the few regions they missed the first time. More isotopic analysis would be great, too.

But the best thing, the work Ware would really love to carry out, to prove these migratory routes and patterns beyond doubt? Transmitters.

And it has been done before, on dragonflies.

A team in New Jersey, in 2007 and 2008, affixed radio transmitters on a bigger cousin of the Pantala, the Green Darner. They leaped into helicopters and tracked the insects as they glided through the ether.

But then the dragonflies flew into Delaware Bay, and the scientists lost their trail.

“Our dragonflies are smaller, too,” says Ware. “I worry that the transmitters would just weigh them down and mean they can’t fly properly.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.