Scientists find 'exquisite' 515-million-year-old fossilized nervous system

Scientists have unearthed an early Cambrian fossil that displays the creature's nervous system. What makes this find significant?

Courtesy of Jie Yang/Yunnan University
Complete specimen of Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis from the early Cambrian Xiaoshiba biota of South China.
Courtesy of Yu Liu/Ludwig-Maximilians-University
Magnification of ventral nerve cord of Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis. The tiny lines are the individual nerves and the dark masses are the ganglia.

A bluish line dotted with dark splotches runs through newly discovered arthropod fossils from the early Cambrian period. Tiny, thin lines splay out from the black masses.

Scientists say this is an ancient, well-preserved example of a complex anatomical structure: the nervous system.

"Because nervous systems are extremely rare in the fossil record, finding one is extremely informative about the early evolution of these animals," study co-author Javier Ortega-Hernández tells The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview.

Researchers reported their findings in a paper published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

These fossils found in China "are unusual and important because they reveal exquisite details of the nerve cord in ancient animals that are over 500 million years [old]," writes Mike Lee, of Flinders University and the South Australian Museum, who was not part of the study, in an email to the Monitor. "These fossils reveal how the nervous system has evolved, over a period of 500 million years."

The preserved animal, called Chengjiangocaris kunmingensis, lived some 515 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion when many major groups of animals emerged during a short, fast period of evolution. As such, studying fossils from this period could tell researchers a lot about early animal evolution.

The fossil is an arthropod, an invertebrate animal with an exoskeleton, segmented body and jointed limbs. Animals such as spiders, crabs, centipedes, lobsters, cicadas, and other insects also fall in the phylum arthropoda. 

But what makes this discovery interesting to researchers is that the fossilized nervous system is unlike those found in living arthropods. The recent arthropods have fewer individual nerves clustered around each individual ganglion – the dark blobs that form the ventral nerve cord. Instead, the ancient animal's nervous system looks more like those of other animals such as velvet worms, Onychophora, which are cousins to arthropods, but, without a hard exoskeleton, they are not arthropods themselves. 

"What this is showing is that this particular fossil is in a type of intermediate state in between something that looks like an Onychophoran and something that looks like a living arthropod," Dr. Ortega-Hernández says. 

He suggests that perhaps the living arthropods have a differently structured nervous system because they have more specialized features than their Cambrian ancestors. Ants, for example, have massive jaws and antennae. But Chengjiangocaris lived in a simpler world. There were fewer predators and less competition so the prehistoric arthropod didn't need to be as specialized.

These newly reported fossils aren't the first to be found with preserved parts of a nervous system from the early Cambrian. But this is the most detailed example of the ventral nerve cord, Ortega-Hernández says. The other fossils displayed more of the brain and less of the nerve cord itself.

Chengjiangocaris is a member of the order Fuxianhuiida, a group of arthropods that scientists place at the base of the arthropod family tree. Growing as long as 6 inches, Chengjiangocaris would have been on the larger size for animals 515 million years ago. 

The animal would have lived on the seafloor and scuttled around a bit like a crustacean on as many as 80 pairs of legs. To eat, these organisms shoveled sediment into their mouths and then digested to extract nutrients.

"They had a relatively uneventful existence back in the day," Ortega-Hernández says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to