Stonehenge bigwigs included women, study suggests

More women than men were found in cremated remains in the historic site's Aubrey Holes, suggesting they held high-status positions. 

Kieran Doherty/ Reuters/ File
Revelers celebrate the winter solstice at Stonehenge in this December 22, 2015 file photo. New research has found women buried at the site's Aubrey Holes, suggesting they enjoyed high status.

Many of Stonehenge's high-status leaders were female, new research suggests, based on excavations of some of the millennia-old monument's oldest graves.

"In almost every depiction of Stonehenge by artists and TV re-enactors we see lots of men, a man in charge, and few or no women," British archaeologist Mike Pitts told Discovery News. 

But those assumptions may be inaccurate, according to an article published in the March/April issue of British Archaeology, which Mr. Pitts edits. 

University College London (UCL) archaeologist Christie Willis pored over 99 pounds of cremated remains from the Stonehenge's Aubrey Holes, which were re-excavated in 2008 after being indelicately unearthed and reburied in the 1930s: researchers at the time realized they would have needed require more advanced technology to make much sense of the bone fragments.

Ms. Willis, a graduate student who specializes in Neolithic remains, used CT scanning and radiocarbon dating to determine the age and sex of people buried in Aubrey Hole 7, one of 56 pits among the oldest features at Stonehenge, which encircle the main ring of stones. The iconic monoliths that the word "Stonehenge" immediately brings to mind were likely erected around 2500 B.C., but the Salisbury Plain was home to a number of sites with seeming religious or political significance, beginning around 3100 B.C.

Willis' analysis identified at least 23 cremated bodies, including 14 women and 9 men — a reversal of other excavated Neolithic burial sites, where men tend to outnumber women. Their cremated remains were likely buried in the hole between 3090 and 2900 B.C. About 64 cremations are believed to be in the other Aubrey Holes, according to English Heritage, which directs preservation and education programs at Stonehenge. 

"Anyone buried at Stonehenge is likely to have been special in some way: high status families, possessors of special skills or knowledge, ritual or political leaders," Mr. Pitts told Discovery. The idea that those buried enjoyed high status is supported by the individuals' apparent good health and relative old age. 

Previous burial excavations around the Stonehenge site have also challenged researchers' earlier assumptions that most burials would be for male leaders. 

UCL Professor Mike Parker Pearson, who supervises Willis' work, led a team who found the remains of 63 elite men, women and children in 2013; they believe the families were buried around 3000 B.C. "We'd thought that maybe it was a place where a dynasty of kings was buried, but this seemed to be much more of a community, a different kind of power structure," Dr. Parker Pearson told the Associated Press. 

Willis' latest findings could indicate a shift from commemorating male lineage and territory to families and classes, Pitts said. But the more egalitarian gains may have been short-lived. According to Willis, women's status in Neolithic society took a turn for the worse shortly after these burial sites were created. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.