As comet 67P cools, one last-ditch effort to call Philae

Philae, the first probe to study a comet up close, has not communicated with Earth in months. Astronomers say they'll make one last effort to call, before the probe travels with the comet too far away from the sun's heat to even turn on.

This two-image mosaic from the Philae comet lander shows the probe on the surface of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. One of the lander’s three feet can be seen in the foreground. Image released Nov. 13, 2014.

For half a year now, the European Space Agency’s Philae robot, a washing-machine-size lander that’s been exploring a comet that orbits the sun every 6.5 years between the orbits of Earth and Jupiter, has been silent.

“With every passing day, Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is getting further and further away from the Sun, and as such, temperatures are falling on the comet's surface,” the ESA reported Friday on its blog.

This is bad news for Philae – named after an inscribed obelisk found that was instrumental in deciphering ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs – because it will not be able to turn on when temperatures reach -60 degrees Fahrenheit.

“Things are getting critical,” says the agency, which is going to make one last attempt to revive Philae by the end of January.

Philae landed on the 2.5-mile-wide (4 kilometers) Comet 67P, a dusty snowball shaped like a rubber duck on November 12, 2014. It was the first probe to land on a comet, dropped off there by Rosetta, a spacecraft named after the Rosetta stone, an ancient stele inscribed with three languages that, like the Philae obelisk, provided a key to the modern understanding of Egyptian hieroglyphs.

Rosetta traveled for 10 years on its mission to catch a comet and land a probe on it, reports.

Unfortunately, the landing was far from smooth, as the 220-pound Philae bounced twice off 67P's surface before it touched down in the wrong spot, one that was too shady to charge the explorer’s solar-powered battery.

But it recovered for a couple of days, which it used to gather a wealth of data from the surface of the comet with its 10 instruments. It then transmitted the data to Rosetta, which has been orbiting 67P and relaying data from Philae and from its own studies back to Earth.

"Philae provided us unique information on a comet's surface properties (and interior) that could not be obtained from orbiter measurements alone," Stephan Ulamec, who manages the Rosetta mission from the German Aerospace Center, told in July, the last time Philae communicated with its team at home.

"We learned so much about comets that now future missions can be adapted in a much better way to this challenging environment," he said.

Among Philae’s discoveries were 16 different organic molecules, including four – methyl isocyanate, acetone, propionaldehyde, and acetamide – that had never been seen before on or around a comet.

"I think an understanding of the organic compounds that are present in this particular comet will have tremendous ramifications for origin-of-life studies," planetary sciences professor Ian Wright, who’s in charge of one of Rosetta’s instruments, told

Astronomers aren’t hopeful about reconnecting with Philae by the end of the month, though  the say they will leave the communication unit on Rosetta switched on in case the probe tries to reboot after January.

Otherwise, Rosetta’s mission will end in September 2016 with no final word from Philae.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to As comet 67P cools, one last-ditch effort to call Philae
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today