Jupiter-like star spot: Are storms more common than astronomers thought?

Astronomers have found the first star with a storm, a discovery that could change scientists' understanding of how cloud storms occur in space.

The Great Red Spot, a storm in Jupiter's atmosphere, is at least 300 years old. Winds blow counterclockwise around the Great Red Spot at about 400 kilometers per hour (250 miles per hour). Astronomers have found a similar storm on a star.

The Pacific Northwest in the United States is getting pounded with storms, and New England eyes the weather with wariness, following its snowiest February on record. But scientists have discovered a storm on a distant star that suggests large meteorological events are not unusual in other parts of the galaxy.

A group of US and Canadian astronomers have scanned the stars and found one with a giant storm rivaling anything seen on this planet, they reported in the Astrophysical Journal. The storm is larger than Earth itself, so astronomers have compared it to the distinctive Red Spot on the planet Jupiter, according to a NASA release.

"The star is the size of Jupiter, and its storm is the size of Jupiter's Great Red Spot," said the study's lead author John Gizis of the University of Delaware, according to a NASA release. "We know this newfound storm has lasted at least two years, and probably longer."

Determining the frequency of such storms will require more time and sky-searching, but the discovery of the first giant star storm proves wild weather is more common in the universe than astronomers had evidence for previously.

"We don't know if this kind of star storm is unique or common, and we don't [know] why it persists for so long," Mr. Gizis said in a NASA release.

The stormy star is technically an L-Dwarf, which is a temperature-based classification including both stars and brown dwarfs. Astronomers believe the celestial body in their study is a star, which would make it the first to have a storm, according to Phys.org.

Astronomers have only recently realized they could see and study cloud storms on brown dwarfs, Space.com reported.

"A large fraction of brown dwarfs show cyclical variability in brightness, suggesting clouds or storms," Aren Heinze of Stony Brook University said in a news conference at the American Astronomical Society in January 2014.

The dark spot is still going strong after two years of observation, according to the study. The storms astronomers found on brown dwarfs were on the scale of hours or days, so the two-year star storm is unique among L-Dwarfs.

Astronomers found this storm by using the Kepler and Spitzer telescopes together, reported a NASA release:

Follow-up observations with Spitzer, which detects infrared light, revealed that the dark patch was not a magnetic star spot but a colossal, cloudy storm with a diameter that could hold three Earths. . . .While this storm looks different when viewed at various wavelengths, astronomers say that if we could somehow travel there in a starship, it would look like a dark mark near the polar top of the star.

Astronomers now have a model of how to use the Kepler and Spitzer telescopes in tandem to locate star storms and plan to keep searching the skies for more out-of-this world weather forecasts.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Jupiter-like star spot: Are storms more common than astronomers thought?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today