How do bats land upside down? Check out their heavy wings

Contrary to conventional wisdom, their heavy wings actually help.

Aeromechanics and Evolutionary Morphology Lab/Brown University
(Top) Selected images from high-speed recordings of C. perspicillata executing a landing maneuver and, upon failing to find a landing site, executing a righting maneuver. (Bottom) Corresponding 3-D reconstruction of the 52-degree-of-freedom flight kinematics.

Of all known flying animals, bats have the heaviest wings in relation to their body weight, but that may not be so bad, according to scientists at Brown University. They recently found that, contrary to popular belief, this flying mammal actually derives some benefits from its wings' heft.

“We always tend to think of weight as a problem for anything that flies,” as more weight requires more energy to move it, says study lead Sharon M. Swartz to The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview.

“Designers are always working on making things lighter,” she adds.

But in the case of at least two bat species, wrote Dr. Swartz and a team of researchers in Monday’s paper in the journal PLOS Biology, the often-overlooked role of inertia in bat flight is a critical force. By drawing in one of their heavy wings, bats use inertia to propel themselves into the acrobatic flips necessary to turn upside down for landing to roost.

This often happens in tight spaces like caves, researchers point out, so there’s little room for the aerodynamic forces typically triggered by flight speed to be the primary catalyst.

Inertia, Swartz explains, “is a less appreciated part of the movement repertoire of animals,” which includes ground reaction forces, hydrodynamic forces that help animals move through water, and aerodynamic forces that push them through air.

“It is a more subtle way to studying how animals and people move through the environment,” says Swartz, a bat researcher at the Aeromechanics and Evolutionary Morphology Lab at Brown.

Researchers discovered the role of inertia in bat flight by studying three Seba’s short-tailed bats (Carollia perspicillata) and two lesser dog-faced fruit bats (Cynopterus brachyotis) who were trained to fly into an enclosed space and land on a piece of mesh attached to the ceiling.

Three high-speed cameras captured the bats right before they landed. Videos show them shifting their weight to flip upside down by pulling one wing closer to their bodies while the other is extended.

This is the same force of inertia that figure skaters use when they pull their arms into their bodies to speed up their dizzying spins. It’s also what cats use when they twist their bodies to land on their feet.

Researchers also removed the mesh landing pad on the ceiling occasionally and found that as soon as the bats flipped over and realized there was nowhere to land, they quickly used the same technique to flip themselves back into flight mode.

This kind of response, she says, could inform flying technologies like drones. In fact, the lab is already working with collaborators at the University of Illinois on designs for flying bat robots, which will have soft, flappable wings. They could be used in homes of people with disabilities to pick things up, for instance, says Swartz.

“Because they’re soft, they don’t get hurt or hurt people,” if they crash, she explains.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.