Leo P: Why this little galaxy is a big starmaker

Data from the Arecibo Observatory reveals a dwarf galaxy that is able to hang on to its star-making gas by keeping its distance from its neighbors.

This optical image of Leo P, captured by the The Arecibo Legacy Fast Arecibo L-band Feed Array (ALFALFA) survey shows the dwarf galaxy's starlight.

A small galaxy some 5.3 million light years from Earth has a message for its neighbors: back off.

The Milky Way is so large it dwarfs almost all nearby galaxies. Being a smaller neighbor to a galaxy such as ours is dangerous – the Milky Way's gravity pulls gas from whatever is orbiting, diminishing that galaxy's star-making power over time. That fate has befallen nearly every small galaxy orbiting the Milky Way.

But a smaller galaxy can still flourish, as long as it keeps its distance. That's the conclusion of a new study from astronomers who used the Hubble Space Telescope to study Leo P, a small not-quite-neighbor to our Milky Way, publishing their findings recently in The Astrophysical Journal. Discovered in 2013, the dwarf galaxy lies relatively distant from the two largest galaxies in our so-called Local Group: the Milky Way and its big sister, Andromeda.

Leo P contains just about a hundred-thousandths as many stars as the Milky Way, and yet it is still churning out more. That's because it has lots of gas to fuel its star-making endeavors. So much, actually, Leo P's gas weighs more than its stars. The tiny galaxy has a promising future as long as it heeds the rule, as Scientific American put it, to not "let any behemoths siphon off your gas." 

While this conclusion bodes well for Leo P – the "P" stands for "pristine" – the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, which first discovered the galaxy, has a much less certain fate. The 50-year-old radio telescope, which holds the distinction of being the largest single-dish radio instrument in the world, has flagging support from its primary benefactor: the US National Science Foundation (NSF).

According to Nature, a "streak of discoveries could be near its end" due to lack of funding. Arecibo has had a distinguished career: it found that the length of a day on Mercury is more like two Earth months than three in 1965. Arecibo discovered the first binary pulsar in 1974, a breakthrough that brought the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics to those researchers. The observatory’s telescope also confirmed discovery of extrasolar planets in the early 1990s, the science journal reports.  

The $12 million annual operating budget for Arecibo is under threat, with the NSF putting it on its list of potential cuts to its astronomy budget.

NSF has been hesitant to cut Arecibo because of its number of contributions to the scientific community, and has been seeking a new entity to help fund the observatory’s operation or possibly take over the facility entirely, Nature reports.

In July, a lead appeared in the form of alien hunters. 

The Breakthrough Listen project, a $100-million effort sponsored by Silicon Valley billionaire Yuri Milner to listen to the nearest 1 million stars for signals - the largest search for intelligent life (SETI) on Earth – is a potential employer of Arecibo.

But NSF pushed back on a plan that would involve Mr. Milner's money. In late October, the science agency issued an open letter soliciting “strategies and goals for continued operations that involve a substantially reduced funding commitment from NSF.”

For Arebico, a new search is on. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Leo P: Why this little galaxy is a big starmaker
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today