CSI crows: What the birds learn from their dead

Crows pay attention to other dead crows, not to mourn, but in an effort to understand what happened, according to a new study.

David Snodgress/Bloomington Herald-Times/AP
Crows fly through the late-evening sky as they head to roosting spots on the near west side of Bloomington, Ind. in this photo taken Nov. 28, 2013,.

Crows, it turns out, are quite observant, especially when it comes to their dead. 

While superstition has often played into the image of the cunning black bird, new research suggests crows commonly pay attention to their dead not to mourn, but in an effort to understand what happened, so the birds still living may avoid a possible threat in the future. It's a survival tactic.

The study tracked observable behaviors like crows calling to each other and gathering around the deceased, says Kaeli Swift, a Ph.D student in environmental science who co-authored the study, which was published earlier this month in Animal Behaviour (paywall). 

American crows, or Corvus brachyrhynchos, the study found, tend to wait before approaching feeding areas where they had seen one of their own dead and to observe potential predators (in this case, human volunteers) nearby. 

Such recognition, according to the study, required just one interaction at the feeding site, and the association with danger could last up to six weeks, suggesting that crows understand the concept of death and can learn and recall possible threats.

Ms. Swift started her two year study by first attracting crows by putting out food to promote nesting and breeding in hundreds of sites across the state of Washington. 

Then, she called in the masked volunteers.

In all, 25 people put on masks to obscure their faces (crows have proven to be shrewd at face recognition) and Swift "asked them to stand near the food for 30 minutes, in clear view of the crows. The masks obscured the volunteers' facial expressions, as well as allowed a rotating cast of people to be involved in the experiment," National Geographic reports. 

Some volunteers stood near a dead red-tailed hawk, a predator of the crow, holding a dead crow. Others stood by a dead red-tailed hawk empty-handed. Sometimes volunteers would hold a dead pigeon, to gauge if another bird, but not another crow, might elicit a response. The control for the experiment was just a masked volunteer, lingering near the feeding areas, with no dead hawk or crow in sight.

Of the four scenarios, in instances where death was present, the crows responded nearly every time by letting out a caw to other crows and to the volunteers, an alert known as "scolding", and would avoid feeding that day from one of Swift's locations, or mobbing nearby in large groups to assert dominance over potential predators. 

According to Swift, "of the four situations, the hawk-and-dead-crow combination provoked the most reaction. The crows did not react to the empty-handed control volunteer." 

Crows are not the only nonhuman animals to appear to understand death and its causes to some degree. A growing body of evidence shows that chimps, elephants, and dolphins may even mourn their dead. 

"This work is another example of how crows have evolved to live so successfully with us," Swift told BBC Earth. "They can learn our faces and do so in an impressive number of circumstances including when we have appeared to out ourselves as one of those prickly neighbours by interacting with their dead."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to CSI crows: What the birds learn from their dead
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today