Mysterious star activity. Is it aliens?

Probably not, but those strange dips in light around a distant star captured by NASA’s Kepler telescope currently lack a satisfactory explanation.

NASA/AP Photo/File
This artist's rendering provided by NASA shows the Kepler space telescope.

Strange dips in light from a star some 1,480 light years from Earth captured by NASA’s Kepler telescope have astronomers searching for an explanation.

The Kepler telescope has been observing several stars for many years, but one star in particular stands out for its unusual light patterns. In its quest to find other habitable planets, Kepler has been keeping an eye on more than 150,000 stars during its journey through the galaxy. In particular, Kepler was looking for dips in light emitted by those stars that could be an indication of planets passing in front of them.

What Kepler found around star KIC 8462852 was unlike any of the other stars that the telescope observed.

We’d never seen anything like this star,” Dr. Tabetha Boyajian, a postdoctoral astronomy fellow at Yale, told The Atlantic. “It was really weird. We thought it might be bad data or movement on the spacecraft, but everything checked out.”

The pattern of light that reaches us from KIC 8462852 is highly irregular. Every few years, it dims inexplicably, for reasons Dr. Boyajian and her astronomy team have not been able to attribute to orbiting planets. What is even more striking is that KIC 8462852 is a mature star. In a young star, the amount of volatility in its light patterns could be easily attributed to extra dust clouds, which would then give off a high amount of infrared light.

Dr. Boyajian and her co-authors explained in a recent paper that KIC 8462852 also could not be influenced by the light coming from neighboring stars, as the distance between them is too great. The researchers are concluding that the source of KIC 8462852’s flickering comes from a giant mass of particles that have remained floating around the star, in apparent defiance of how orbiting bodies are expected to behave.

“It was kind of unbelievable that it was real data,” Dr. Boyajian told New Scientist. “We were scratching our heads. For any idea that came up there was always something that would argue against it.”

Because the scientists have also ruled out the possibility that the orbiting objects could be comets or pieces from an asteroid impact, other astronomers are raising the question of alien engineering.  

“When [Dr. Boyajian] showed me the data, I was fascinated by how crazy it looked,” Dr. Jason Wright, associate professor of astronomy at Pennsylvania State University, told The Atlantic. “Aliens should always be the very last hypothesis you consider, but this looked like something you would expect an alien civilization to build.”

For Dr. Wright, the collection of particles around the star demonstrates the possibility of an ‘alien megastructure,’ or a collection of devices that an alien civilization could possibly have built to harness solar energy.

In order to find out if aliens are, in fact, responsible for these bizarre objects near the star, Dr. Boyajian and her fellow researchers are teaming up with the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley. They will be pointing radio dishes at the star to search for those radio waves that technological devices, at least the ones made by humans, tend to emit.

While Dr. Wright admits that extraterrestrial life could be a possibility, he told Slate, “[there is] a need to hypothesize, but we should also approach it skeptically.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.