Can 149 climate pledges forestall ocean ecosystem collapse?

Climate change: Nearly 150 countries have pledged to cut down on carbon emissions as scientists warn that current emission levels severely threaten the diversity and abundance of marine life.

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg/Centre for Marine Studies/The University of Queensland/AP/File
Fish swim through bleached coral near the Keppel Islands in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

Europe’s climate change commissioner is smiling, but some scientists have worry lines.

As nations prepare for a global conference on climate change, an “astounding” 149 governments have pledged to cut down on carbon emissions, Miguel Arias Cañete said Tuesday, something he wouldn’t have thought possible just six months ago.

“There are many, many reasons to be cheerful,” Commissioner Cañete told the BBC. “The fact that 149 countries to date have presented the United Nations their commitments to fight global warming is astonishing.”

These new policies would limit the predicted rise in global temperature from between 3.8 degrees and 4.7 degrees Celsius to about “3 [degrees] C maximum,” Cañete said.  

“That's a big step, although clearly it's not enough,” he added. The temperature increase needs to be brought down to about 2 degrees C to be deemed safe for most countries, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

But even as nations around the world take steps to protect humans from carbon emissions, scientists are investigating their impact on underwater life – and the picture is sobering.

If emissions keep climbing, say marine ecologists at the University of Adelaide, ocean ecosystems will be severely threatened by 2100.

Many scientists have studied various, scattered effects of climate change and ocean acidification, but now those studies are building into one comprehensive look at the oceanic effects of climate change, published Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Until now, there has been almost total reliance on qualitative reviews and perspectives of potential global change,” said marine ecologist Sean Connell, co-author of the study, in a statement. “Where quantitative assessments exist, they typically focus on single stressors, single ecosystems, or single species.”

Professors Connell and Ivan Nagelkerken analyzed more than 630 published experiments, ranging from the bleaching of coral reefs to the competitive strengths of seaweeds to the effects of global warming on sharks’ hunting behavior.

They found that “more than half of the world’s ocean has experienced an increase in cumulative human impact over a 5[-year] time span, predominantly driven by increasing climate stressors such as sea surface temperature, ocean acidification, and UV radiation.”

Sea creatures' abilities to adapt to the warming ocean will be “limited,” warned the scientists. They predict shrinking sea populations and widespread extinctions if climate change is not curbed.

Some plankton species will flourish in warmer waters, reports The Christian Science Monitor, but on the whole, “there will be a species collapse from the top of the food chain down,” predicts Professor Nagelkerken.

“With higher metabolic rates in the warmer water, and therefore a greater demand for food, there is a mismatch with less food available for carnivores – the bigger fish that fisheries industries are based around,” he added.

For now, the climate change pact is a step in the right direction. The world’s biggest economies are leading the way, Jacquie McGlade, chief scientist of the UN environment programme, told the BBC. 

"When [smaller] countries saw the big players – the EU, the USA – put their figures on the table, there's a bit of copycat – which is a good thing,” she said. “This is going to be a race to the top, not the bottom.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can 149 climate pledges forestall ocean ecosystem collapse?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today