Do we owe our existence to this prehistoric beaver?

After finding buck-toothed fossils in the New Mexico badlands, researchers suggest a beaver-like species likely thrived after an asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. 

Tom Williamson/Reuters
The teeth of Kimbetopsalis is pictured in this undated handout photo provided by Tom Williamson. Scientists on October 5, 2015, announced the discovery in northwestern New Mexico's badlands of the fossil remains of Kimbetopsalis simmonsae, a plant-eating rodent-like mammal boasting buck-toothed incisors like a beaver that lived just a few hundred thousand years after the mass extinction, a blink of the eye in geological time.

A paper published in the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society Monday suggests a prehistoric beaver species might have paved the way for all mammals, including humans.

After finding fossil remains of the Kimbetopsalis simmonsae in northwestern New Mexico, researchers believe that Kimbetopsalis looked like a prehistoric version of a beaver, covered in fur with buck-toothed incisors. It was even the size of modern-day beavers, averaging about 3 feet and 50 pounds. 

Although superficially similar to the beaver, Kimbetopsalis was not a rodent, but a multituberculate, an extremely successful mammal group that originated alongside the dinosaurs and survived for 120 million years, disappearing only 35 million years ago.

But what is most remarkable, say the researchers, is that Kimbetopsalis thrived just a few hundred thousand years after the asteroid impact.

That’s a blink of the eye in geological terms, a miniscule speck of time in the 4.5-billion-year history of the planet,” University of Edinburgh paleontologist and study co-author Stephen Brusatte wrote to Gizmodo. “Kimbetopsalis shows us how quickly the Earth changed from a dinosaur-dominated world to one overrun with mammals.”

“An asteroid fell out of the sky one day and the world changed in an instant,” Thomas Williamson, lead author of the paper and curator of paleontology at the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, explained to Vice News.

“Dinosaurs had been dominant for over 100 million years and they quickly disappeared," he said. "Mammals – which had been living in the shadows of the dinosaurs for many tens of millions of years – made it through the extinction and suddenly had the opportunity to diversify in the brave new world. And they did this quickly, very quickly.”

So how did this beaver-like mammal not only live, but thrive?

Dr. Williamson suggests that their habitat and diet are the main reasons for success. Although the area in New Mexico where the fossils were found is a high desert today, it was a tropical rainforest during Kimbetopsalis’s time.

“As a rainforest, the area was highly productive with lots of fruit and seed-bearing trees,” Williamson explains. Flowering plants had risen to dominate tropical forests during the Late Cretaceous and multituberculates really increased in diversity at about that time, possibly due to the new food sources that these plants provided.”

The researchers agree that the animal’s teeth were specialized for plant-chewing, with sharp incisors at the front and rows of cusps in the back.

Dr. Brusatte says that the primitive mammals able to survive alongside the dinosaurs were far smaller than Kimbetopsalis, and it is unlikely that a larger mammal could have survived on a plant-based diet before the mass extinction.

“So it looks like mammals rapidly began to get bigger, evolve new diets, and colonize new environments very soon after the dinosaurs bit the dust,” he added. 

And the Kimbetopsalis “wasn’t some lonesome pioneer navigating the wreckage of a destroyed landscape,” but rather one of many mammals flourishing in post-apocaplyptic times, explains Brusatte.

But researchers still believe we have the Kimbetopsalis to thank for human existence because they were a part of a mammal evolution-boom that let to primates. And well, the rest is history.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.