We assumed fish didn't care about each other. We were wrong.

Researchers have long thought fish were heartless and cold, incapable of the relationships mammals cultivate, but new research among fish in coral reefs suggests fish can work in long-term paired relationships. 

Queensland Tourism/AP
A diver snorkels in the Great Barrier Reef off Australia's Queensland state. Rabbitfishes from a coral reef have just been found to exhibit reciprocal cooperation, meaning they are the first fish known to take care of each other.

Fish living in the vast network of coral reefs near Australia are already known to moviegoers for their devotion, thanks to the loving clownfish father-and-son pair in Pixar's "Finding Nemo."

But in reality, marine researchers have long thought fish were a bit cold and self-centered. A recent study published Friday indicates that their temperament is warming by a few degrees. 

Clownfish like Marlin and Nemo do have a symbiotic relationship with anemones, according to PBS, but another inhabitant of the coral reef – the rabbitfish – shows the first-observed signs of what researchers call reciprocal cooperation. This means one fish helps another, and the effort, no matter how small, is somehow returned. 

Members of this coral reef fish species feed in pairs, according to a study published at ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University in Australia. Rabbitfish couples have a symbiotic relationship, and one member of the pair helps by keeping watch while the other fish eats. 

Such behavior had not been seen or suspected in fish before, though it has been studied with great success in some birds and mammal species, especially primates, according to study authors Simon J. Brandl & David R. Bellwood from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies. 

"There has been a long-standing debate about whether reciprocal cooperation can exist in animals that lack the highly developed cognitive and social skills found in humans and a few species of birds and primates," said Dr. Simon Brandl in a press release. 

Rabbitfish have been known to travel in schools, as many fish do, to maintain safety in numbers. But researchers also observed that rabbitfish benefit from the pair relationship – those traveling in pairs are willing to dive deeper into the crevices of the coral reef than those that swim alone.  They also stick around to finish their dinner, taking more bites of food at once than singles do. 

Rabbitfish pairs seemed to have a system for standing – or swimming – guard, and the same two fish stay together for some time. Researchers observed that one rabbitfish would forage head-down for food while the other would watch, head up. The watcher would swim away – probably fleeing from danger – leading the forager to follow, according to the study published in the journal Scientific Reports.

"In other words, one partner stays ‘on guard’ while the other feeds – these fishes literally watch each others’ back," Dr. Brandl said.

The study's co-author said the study suggests that other fish of the ocean may have greater social depth than had been thought. His hope is that more study will soon follow to plumb the social mechanisms of ocean life.

"Our findings should further ignite efforts to understand fishes as highly developed organisms with complex social behaviors,” Dr. David Bellwood said in a press release. "This may also require a shift in how we study and ethically treat fishes."

These aquatic creatures from Australia "really do look after their mates," the release reads. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to We assumed fish didn't care about each other. We were wrong.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today