Water on Mars: Does it make life more likely?

The discovery of briny liquid water flowing on the surface of Mars suggests that the Red Planet may be more hospitable to life than we thought.

NASA/JPL/University of Arizona
Dark streaks painting the side of Martian hills were likely formed by saltwater, scientists announced today (Sept. 28). What does the presence of liquid water imply for life on the Red Planet?

The discovery of liquid (albeit very salty) water on Mars may suggest that the Red Planet is more habitable than previously thought, according to scientists.

Strange, dark streaks that run down the sides of hills on the surface of Mars are formed partly by the presence of liquid water, scientists announced today (Sept. 28). Using NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), the researchers say they now have strong evidence that salty water soaks the planet's surface soil, perhaps even flows down the slopes, and creates the dark streaks.

"Water, as I'm sure many of you have heard us say on multiple occasions, is an essential ingredient for life," said Mary Beth Wilhelm, a planetary science researcher at the NASA Ames Research Center, in a NASA briefing earlier today (Sept. 28). "Our results may point to more habitable conditions on the near surface of Mars than previously thought." [Flowing Water on Mars: The Discovery in Pictures]

The surface of Mars is, for the most part, extremely inhospitable to life. But life on Earth has proven again and again to be incredibly tenacious. There are life-forms that can survive incredibly hot and cold temperatures, extreme doses of radiation, and highly salty pools of water. But the authors of the new study, which was published online today (Sept. 28) in the journal Nature Geoscience, said they can't yet make any direct comparisons between the saltwater found on Mars and environments on Earth.

"The potential habitability by Earth-like microbes is unclear," said Wilhelm, who is one of the authors on the paper announcing the new finding. "To assess habitability, we would first need to determine how cold and how concentrated the brine is."

The dark streaks of saltwater found on Mars are technically referred to as "recurring slope linea," or RSLs. Michael Meyer, lead scientist for the Mars exploration program at NASA, noted during the briefing that similar-looking streaks have been observed in Antarctica.

"The difficulty is that something that looks the same doesn't mean it is the same, so we don't know if it's the same mechanism [causing the streaks]," Meyer said. "But at least we have something that looks similar, so that's being studied."

The question of whether life can survive in the Martian brines is further complicated because most of the brines are seasonal. They appear in the early Martian spring but then disappear in the Martian autumn and winter months, said Alfred McEwen, principal investigator for the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) aboard MRO, who also spoke during the NASA briefing.

RSLs at the equator of Mars can be observed year-round, McEwen said, but they move with the sun throughout the year (so they appear on the slopes that get the most sunlight). Because the RSLs don't constitute a permanent feature, any life-forms they might support would have to find a way to survive when the water disappears (there are life forms on Earth that can go into hibernation during periods of drought).

Another relevant question in the search for life in these RSLs is the source of the water. The authors of the new research said their leading hypothesis is that the water is absorbed from the Martian atmosphere. MRO detected a type of salt called a perchlorate, which can suck water out of the air — a process called deliquescence. But, the scientists noted that it's possible that the water is coming from subsurface supplies.

"If I were a microbe on Mars, I would probably not live near one of these RSLs," said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate. "I would want to live further north or south, at higher latitudes, quite far under the surface, where there's a freshwater glacier. We only suspect those places exist, and we have some scientific evidence that they do. And that's a subject of future exploration, when we can find subsurface ice that's a few meters or deeper below the surface and that's fresh water. And I think that's going to be a very exciting area of exploration in the future."

Grunsfeld noted that these RSLs would likely receive attention in future Mars rover missions and other studies of the Red Planet.

"I can't imagine that it won't be a high priority for the scientific community to send something … to go to these areas, and may have a life-detection capability to see if there's life there that's similar to [life on] Earth," he said.

Follow Calla Cofield @callacofieldFollow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article onSpace.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.