Rosetta finds clues about mysterious origins of comet 67P

The oddly-shaped 'rubber duck' comet may have formed when two comets fused together billions of years ago, says a new study.

The Aug. 22, 2014 photo taken by the Navcam of the Rosetta space probe and released by European Space Agency ESA on Monday, shows Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasi­menko. Researchers have now concluded that the comet was probably formed when two separate objects collided during the early stages of the Solar System, according to a paper published Monday in the journal Nature.

When scientists got their first close-up look of a comet last year it didn’t look like what they expected.

Instead of the single ball of rock and ice they had imagined, scientists instead saw two distinct "lobes" of rock and ice fused together. The comet looked vaguely like a rubber duck, some thought.

Now scientists think they know how the comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko achieved this shape, claiming that their discovery could give significant insight into how comets and planets may have formed billions of years ago.

Using data collected by cameras onboard the Rosetta space probe – which has been orbiting the comet since August 2014 – scientists were able to determine that the comet is made up of two smaller bodies that may have once collided, then fused together over billions of years. The findings were published Monday in the journal Nature.

"For the first time, this study gives observational evidence on how the primordial bodies formed," Matteo Massironi, one of the study's authors and a researcher at the University of Padova in Italy, told the Associated Press.

High resolution imaging of the comet showed that layers on the larger lobe formed independently of layers on the smaller lobe.

Jay Melosh, a professor of planetary science at Purdue University who wasn’t involved in the study, told AP the discovery indicates that "the two lobes grew separately and only joined together later in their history, gently 'docking' together during an ancient encounter that apparently did little damage to either partner." 

"This growth is believed to have occurred about 4.5 billion years ago, contemporaneous with the formation of the solar system," added Dr. Melosh, who has been involved in a number of NASA missions exploring comets Tempel 1 and Hartley 2.

Dr. Massironi said the fusion likely occurred in the early years of the solar system, while dust was still coagulating into larger bodies on the outskirts of the system and planets were still forming in the interior of the system.

Comets are valuable assets for scientists studying the early solar system, since they are essentially frozen remains of the same rocks and dust that formed the system’s eight (or nine) planets.

As The Christian Science Monitor’s Pete Spotts wrote in January, comets "are thought to carry some of the most pristine ingredients the young sun and its extended disk of dust and gas had to offer as raw material for planets."

"Comets are also known to carry organic compounds," he added, "and are thought to be one type of vehicle that delivered water and organic chemicals to Earth – chemicals that could serve as building blocks for more complex molecules underpinning organic life."

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Rosetta finds clues about mysterious origins of comet 67P
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today